The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Hog Farm _Talk 06:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hardings Coaches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. SK2242 (talk) 08:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 08:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 08:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 08:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as I cannot find any evidence this is notable enough for an article. It is surprising that it has been an article since 2006, yet over the last 5 years, the highest daily page views was 12, with an average of 1. Searching proves the company exists, but nothing noteworthy about it. Even a recent news article on the company couldn't write anything particularly interesting. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.