Danilo Arboleda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 18:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Dan Taras article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 16:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GiantSnowman. Hi. Are references only needed for the player's height, and not for the other parameters in the infobox? And, one more question: Dan Taras has 5 national team appearances according to national-football-teams.com and eu-football. What is the reason for not including the non-fifa matches? Sørhaug (talk) 18:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INFOBOXREF applies, but height (along with full names) have always been referenced directly in the infobox as they (particularly height) are popular targets for vandals... we do not count non-FIFA games because they are not official. GiantSnowman 20:25, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Eliteserien Promotion/Relegation play-offs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that we only include domestic league games in the infobox - so no Cup or Continental matches etc. Please also ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. GiantSnowman 15:22, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GiantSnowman. Hi. On what page did I add cup or continental matches in the infobox? I don't recall doing that. I do tend to update the date, but I don't use the five tildes. I tend to write the date "by hand". Is that not recommended? Sørhaug (talk) 15:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't added any cup games that I am aware of - it was just a reminder. And yes, five tildes is preferred, per {{Infobox football biography}}. GiantSnowman 16:21, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing this and these mistakes. It was really late at night when I wrote most of the article, so I appreciate you fixing those errors. Mwiqdoh (talk) 20:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mwiqdoh: No problem! Sørhaug (talk) 07:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Norwegian Football Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sørhaug. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sebastian Sørlie Henriksen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change from the base name Eliteserien to the sponsor name Tippeligaen at Mike Kjølø? Well, I see that the link was red, I just forgot to turn it blue. Geschichte (talk) 13:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Geschichte: You're right, I guess it could have been redirected instead. Sørhaug (talk) 13:39, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sørhaug

Thank you for creating 2019 Norwegian Second Division (women).

User:I dream of horses, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I've nominated you for the autopatrolled right. Hopefully, the articles you created won't need to be checked shortly.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sørhaug, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Seddon ^talk 00:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dacia Buiucani logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a matches data of the NM Cup until 1999 with a goalscorers and referees? Jolicnikola (talk) 18:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jolicnikola: No, unfortunately. The best one I know is RSSSF, but they only have results (except for the finals). Sørhaug (talk) 07:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have them on a Viking, Rosenborg and a few more clubs's season articles on a Norwegian Wikipedia and on the site stb.guru (for a Stabæk's matches). There were also on lynhistorie.com (for Lyn), but unfortunately, the links are down. Jolicnikola (talk) 13:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also you have rbkmedia.no for Rosenborg's match data. Jolicnikola (talk) 17:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just wrote for Lyn's results but the results pages are again working (finally)! Jolicnikola (talk) 19:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jolicnikola: Here's a reference for Vålerenga's semi-finals and finals from 1949 to 2005: link. You can also find some match reports in newspapers. Example: The semifinal between Strømsgodset and Viking in 1973, but it's difficult to find early rounds. Sørhaug (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did all the finals start at 13:15 CET since the beginning of the competition? Also this is for Vålerenga but only's archive from 1996 to 2003. Jolicnikola (talk) 13:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jolicnikola: It seems most finals started at 13:15, but I don't know about all of them. Also, the time is not always displayed in match reports from the early 1900's, so it is better to just omit the time if the match report does not include it. Sørhaug (talk) 09:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the site for Brann's match data was recently created (branntall.no), but the archive data has uncomplete (I believe it is still working in progress, so maybe there will be more). Jolicnikola (talk) 14:18, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you find somewhere the complete results of first and second round of the Norwegian Football Cup from 1960 to 1964 and of 1966 season because that they are not in Norwegian Wikipedia, and I copy those results from that Wikipedia. Jolicnikola (talk) 00:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My go-to source is RSSSF, but they don't have the first and second rounds in those years unfortunately. Sørhaug (talk) 08:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can copy the results of first and second round from 1945 to 1949 from Norwegian Wikipedia. Jolicnikola (talk) 16:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the results which I found them. (of Viking, Start, Lyn, Stabæk, Rosenborg, Brann, Lillestrøm etc.) Jolicnikola (talk) 13:35, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FC Bălți logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Akhisarspor sections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:59, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please create a Viking FK's 2024 season article with a squad, transfers, pre-season and a competitons matches. The new season starts in a couple of days. Jolicnikola (talk) 15:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creating it now. Your work with the 2024 season articles is very good. Keep it up! Sørhaug (talk) 17:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:FC Nizhny Novgorod seasons has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. EpicAdventurer (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning! I have noticed that Category:Football rivalries in Norway is a bit light. We have Vålerenga-Lyn, Vålerenga-Lillestrøm and Rosenborg-Molde. While we definitely should not exaggerate football rivalries, as has been the case with some WP:OR articles that have ended up being deleted, here are some other ideas for rivalries if you're interested:

• Bodø/Glimt-Tromsø
• Vålerenga-Brann
• Viking-Haugesund?-Bryne?-Brann? (Rogaland derby/Vestlandsderby. How fierce are they?)
• Mjøndalen-Strømsgodset
• Kongsvinger-Hamkam
• Fredrikstad-Moss-Sarpsborg

Are there any pre-war or post-war rivalries worth digging into? What about Viking-Stavanger IF, for instance? Odd-Pors? Steinkjer-Rosenborg? Skeid-Vålerenga? Even Start-Donn gave some news hits regarding a rivalry up to the 1960s-1970s. Geschichte (talk) 07:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the match results of the Norwegian Cup from 1961 to 1966 seasons, and a match reports (goal scorers, attendance and referee) between 1970 and 1989, plus from 1992 and 1997, which I found from a various websites. You can help me if you have the results and the reports (scorers, attendance and referee). Jolicnikola (talk) 00:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The referee of the Molde-Rosenborg is missing, and I can't find the information about who was referee of the second leg of the semi finals of 1994 Norwegian Cup. Can you find that information? Jolicnikola (talk) 18:24, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moves like this are never uncontroversial - please take to WP:RM. GiantSnowman 17:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you convert the Viking FK's season articles from the Norwegian Wikipedia up to 2012? Jolicnikola (talk) 10:42, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 September 9 § Category:Allerød FK on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 14:52, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 September 21 § Category:Antigua and Barbuda football clubs 2012–13 season on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 08:42, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 September 29 § Category:K.V.V. Crossing Elewijt on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 09:54, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 1 § Category:Sport in Eidsvoll on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 13:39, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tajikistani football club seasons by year indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:45, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Latvian football club seasons by year indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:47, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Lithuanian football club seasons by year indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:49, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Geschichte (talk) 20:32, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) Sørhaug (talk) 21:11, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 December 8 § Category:Rodez AF templates on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 10:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you edited Aalesund to be alphabetically first in order for 2026 Eliteserien (Draft).
Just to be sure, this is based on English alphabetical order only?
Since atleast in Norwegian alphabetical order, Aa (phonetic Å) is last in order and if two of same name phonetically that start with Aa and Å respectively, then Å comes first and Aa second. Citanoo (talk) 11:34, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Putting double A last in an alphabetical list seems strange to me. The Norwegian Football Federation at least sorts Aa first and Å last. See here. (Click "alle kamper" and sort by "hjemmelag".) Sørhaug (talk) 12:03, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the reason for this is just English set up in most systems due to ASCII as default. It is the same in writing software such as Word and Excel if you use English as set authoring language. However if you set it to Norwegian (Bokmål), it would reorder Aalesund to the bottom as if the "Aa" is an Å. The reordering is based on the phonetics (sounds) so the "Aa" would be an "Å".

Also according to Store Norske Leksion, Aa words that use the Å sound is sorted as Å in alphabetical order. See here

Now, at the same time. Should we treat names with Aa in the English wiki with the Norwegian language structure in mind or are we ignoring the phonetic Å if that is the case for a name? Citanoo (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

English Wikipedia sorts both "aa" and "å" as "a" anyway. So in that case Vålerenga should come before Viking etc. But since we are talking about Norwegian names, it could be argued that Norwegian rules should apply, including sorting "aa" as "å", so that Aalesund goes last in the list.

Norwegian football articles on the English Wikipedia are quite inconsistent on this matter as far as I am aware. Aalesund is often put first in alphabetical lists. I am not sure if there are any guidelines regarding this issue. I could not find any. Sørhaug (talk) 14:28, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Allright. Too bad there are no guidelines about it. I found the general article about alphabetical order but that was for general use and not strictly Wikipedia usage.
There is also an article about order of page names. Not sure if that can be used to solve the answer. It seems to hint more towards the actual order being a choice of the individual editor rather than a set rule.

I also notice categories also sort 0-9 A-Z only and that English Wikpedia for categories are grouping accented characters together (Hence Æ and Å with A, Ø with O). Again that does not state rules for standard sorting in articles using non-English letters (..which it maybe should somewhere).

My guess is: There are no rules about it. The editors themselves decide. Citanoo (talk) 19:08, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. One thing to keep in mind however is consistency across similar articles. Aalesund has been sorted first in all Tippeligaen/Eliteserien articles that I have seen. Vålerenga has been sorted infront of Viking on most season articles, except from 2021-2025. So, the "English" sorting seems to be dominant. It seems reasonable to me to keep using that same "standard". Sørhaug (talk) 19:55, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good to me! (Especially regarding sorting of "Aa").
I would still prefer Vålerenga after Viking, Åsane at bottom etc. It's just "weird" as a Norwegian to see Æ, Ø and Å as letters 27, 28 and 29 being sorted anywhere else than the bottom after A-Z.

But I don't mind thinking of Æ and Å as A and Ø as O when it comes to sorting or list placements. Citanoo (talk) 20:29, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apparently had this page on my watchlist. Neither can I find any specific reference in the MOS. But I think one should think about that the general English-language reader has no or very limited knowledge of sorting orders in different alphabets and therefore it should be sorted A, Aa, Ab ... As/Ås ... B. For example, Czech and Slovak alphabets sort the digraph Ch not together with C but with H and I would find it strange if that was followed in English text. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 12:59, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]