2021 Military Historian of the Year
		As voted by your peers within the Military history WikiProject, I hereby award you the WikiProject Barnstar for being nominated for the 2021 Military Historian of the Year Award. Congratulations, and thank you for your efforts throughout the year. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

		The WikiChevrons
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the WikiChevrons for participating in 15 reviews between October and December 2021. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 19:42, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

01:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume XI, Issue XII, December 2021 Headlines Australia report: Writing The Record: the Australian Music Wikipedia project launches Colombia report: We were editing about Bogotan writers Croatia report: Ab ovo. Towards future reports... New Zealand report: The New Zealand Wikidata thesis project Poland report: Safeguarding the heritage of a community Sweden report: Commons project with Göteborg museums was a success; Digital humaniora meets Wikidata; HBTQI, Europeana and WiR UK report: 2021 in Review USA report: Smithsonian Institution Training Content Partnerships Hub report: Adding more Structured Data on Commons statements WMF GLAM report: Some structured data developments Calendar: January's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

19:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

21:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello Hawkeye7, I would like to apologize for my revision. I was not aware of the fact that Fat Man and Little Boy referred to the type of bomb. I just was surprised when reading the article to find that syntax. I saw the notice about vandalism and jumped to the conclusion that perhaps it was referring to something similar. I read the FAQ and understand now, perhaps a solution would be to explain that distinction in article? Maybe calling it "a Little Boy type bomb" or something like that. I think some people, like me, instantly picture a literal man being dropped from the bomber. Just a thought but thank you for teaching me something new. And again, it was my intention to help, not hurt and please accept my sincere apology. --Bjlaurie (talk) 09:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

No worries. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia Review essay: Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ronald Evans (astronaut) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 23:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

In my opinion the article is far too long, and contains content not relevant to her notability. Example: "...which was more than she made as a surgical resident, but when she went to buy a town house she was told that her income was $3,000 short of what was required, even with her father putting up the deposit. United Savings and Loan refused to lend her the money without her father's co-signature, which was obtained. She also bought a new Chevrolet Corvette." A Personal life section should be recreated, and content about her marriage and children moved there. That she "fell pregnant" is awkward. Good luck with both of your astronaut GA reviews. As an earthbound, civilian biochemist, I am not qualified to be a reviewer. David notMD (talk) 11:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

21:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

The article Ronald Evans (astronaut) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ronald Evans (astronaut) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 01:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your work writing basically the whole article on Harley Wilhelm.CountMacula (talk) 14:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume XII, Issue I, January 2022 Headlines Belgium report: Belgium report Brazil report: A portable museum experience to digitize and share collections online Colombia report: Let's celebrate the Public domain day with Wikisource Estonia report: Mobile Photo Studio + New Cooperations Finland report: Photowalks in Helsinki, autumn 2021 France report: Training course for Musée de l'armée staff members; Journée Wikimédia Culture et numérique 2022; Wikiway Indonesia report: GLAM Indonesia wrap-up; Public Domain Day 2022 in Indonesia; #1Lib1Ref Italy report: Collaborations and new projects in January Romania report: About #1lib1ref activities in Romania (and Moldova) Serbia report: Successful end of the Old and even more successful beginning of the New year Spain report: BiBat Museum and libraries Sweden report: Uploads of photographs taken by Swedish missionaries in China; Sörmlands museum's first contributions UK report: Khalili Collections and British Library USA report: Report from DPLA AvoinGLAM report: Hello, world! Content Partnerships Hub report: Results and summaries; Helping with getting Pattypan back on track; Working with partners to make content available Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: February 22: Meetup about SDC support in OpenRefine WMF GLAM report: Wikimedia campaigns for librarians and museum workers; Community Wishlist Survey; and Wikimedia query services Calendar: February's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

19:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Frederick Browning is broken, you may want to fix/redo the code. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of the new script. What a pain. But I can't do anything about it because I'm not an admin. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 11:24, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

19:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Ack, did I fail to notify you when we split WP:URFA/2020 into WP:URFA/2020A and WP:URFA/2020B because of page length? FACbot hasn't updated the TFA dates since November. See Wikipedia_talk:Unreviewed_featured_articles/2020#FACbot. I went back and got all the missing, but haven't done anything yet re March. Bst, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes, but I have updated the TFA run, and it should be fine from now on. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Yep, we're good, thanks Hawkeye, and sorry for the excess pings. Bst, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kathryn D. Sullivan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

The article Kathryn D. Sullivan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kathryn D. Sullivan for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello Hawkeye, and congrats on all he fine work since I've "talked" to you. Just checking, do you mind if 'Ronald Evans (astronaut)' moved, via RM, to primary of Ron Evans and Ronald Evans (see Evans talk page for number breakdown)? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

No objection. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

FYI. Thanks for the heads up on this essential re-thinking. My actual scholarship is so pre-2000 centered, as is my personal library. So much context to catch up on. Lots to re-read... BusterD (talk) 21:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

22:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
• AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
• Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
• GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
• Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
• SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
• Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Good work, thank you very much. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

The article Kathryn D. Sullivan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kathryn D. Sullivan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 23:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

21:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Judith Resnik you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 12:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sally Ride you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 16:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume XII, Issue II, February 2022 Headlines Albania report: Traditional Food Photography Belgium report: Shakespeare is dead - Contemporary playwriting festival; Public Domain Day Belgium 2022 (10/02) report Estonia report: An examples of a visual storytelling – two virtual exhibitions France report: Wikimedian in Residence in Clermont Auvergne Italy report: New agreement for Wiki Loves Monument Italy 2022 Kosovo report: Traditional Food Photography Netherlands report: New photo collections of Alkmaar, Wiki goes Caribbean meeting, contemporary art Wikidata import and knowledge platform for GLAMS New Zealand report: National Digital Forum and Editing in a Time of COVID Nigeria report: 1Lib1Ref 2022 Kwara Poland report: New GLAM-Wiki partnerships and cooperations Serbia report: A month in the sign of 1Lib1Ref Sweden report: Additional photos from Swedish missionairies; Historical maps of Ukraine UK report: Khalili Collections Ukraine report: Stand with Ukraine! USA report: Women's History Month activities AvoinGLAM report: February in AvoinGLAM Content Partnerships Hub report: Encyclopaedia of Life release their 2 million species descriptions under CC0 Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: Editing SDC with OpenRefine; Monthly OpenRefine and Wikimedia office hours Calendar: March's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

22:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rhea Seddon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

The article Judith Resnik you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Judith Resnik for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 22:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

15:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Presently, I am editing at 2022 Invasion of Ukraine and am also looking at the military article for envelopment. None of the top editors there seem to be current and I was wondering if you could point me to someone at Wikipedia who understands this military language and might know the best way to phrase the current envelopment of the border of Eastern Ukraine as a tactic of attaining military objectives. Anyone come to mind that it might be useful for me to contact about this? ErnestKrause (talk) 16:10, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

The best place to ask is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. All the experts hang out there. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:19, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

19:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

The article Rhea Seddon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rhea Seddon for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 21:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

21:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 11,594 views (483.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 05:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

19:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

The article Sally Ride you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sally Ride for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 05:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume XII, Issue III, March 2022 Headlines Argentina report: Visual culture, human rights and digitization Australia report: Australia grows gender equity for International Women's Day Belgium report: Collaboration with GLAM institutes in Belgium Brazil report: Pills of GLAM Croatia report: ...starting bottom-up in indie archive! Estonia report: Glass, Books and Paintings France report: Mooc Wikidata India report: Wikimedian-in-Residence program initiated at the Research Institute of World's Ancient Traditions, Cultures and Heritage in Arunachal Pradesh Italy report: The growth of sharing on Wikimedia projects Netherlands report: Letters from Sierra Leone: the Sjoerd Hofstra photo collection in a new light New Zealand report: Forming Wikimedia Aotearoa and the Aotearoa New Zealand Theses Project Serbia report: News in Wikipedian in residence projects Spain report: WikiToro Sweden report: The Unique Historical Kalmar County project continues ...; WikiGap x 3; Students writing articles UK report: Khalili Collections Uruguay report: GLAM Activities by Wikimedia Uruguay USA report: Women's History Month Content Partnerships Hub report: UN Environment Programme sharing their knowledge on Wikipedia. Logo competition Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: OpenRefine: survey for Structured Data on Commons features WMF GLAM report: Commons APP calls, Bophana documentaries, and Image Description Week Calendar: April's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

23:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2022 AFL Women's Grand Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 03:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I’m trying to find a link to an interview with my father and cbs anchor man Walter Cronkite in April of 1970 regarding the Apollo 13. I was wondering if you could help me, I see you have been the major editor of his Wikipedia page.

Jamie Phelan Aka: Jamie Marla McCarthy Phelanold@gmail.com (281)224-1324 Houston, Texas Wammzy (talk) 04:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

The article 2022 AFL Women's Grand Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2022 AFL Women's Grand Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 09:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

22:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

The article List of United States Military Academy First Captains has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable subject, lacks independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

Hi Hawkeye, looks like the bot didn't process this one? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

The FAC nomination template had been removed from the talk page. I restored it, and the nomination has been processed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

The paragraph in question does not have a citation listed for the 67 figure.

I have reviewed the edit and find it was constructive. I realize there can be differing opinions but to characterize it has not constructive is highly inflammatory, uncivil, and false. Please do not use such strong language. Do not use a template without first reviewing the language. Doing so is not constructive. Thank you. Charliestalnaker (talk) 06:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

The lead is a summary of the article, and so does not have citations. The citation is present, in the body. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

19:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, try as I might I cannot see the part of this article where it indicates that there was more than one bomb called "Little Boy". Could you please point it out to me? Britmax (talk) 21:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

See the Little Boy article, particularly the sections on Rehearsals and Post-war. Little Boy was the name of the type of the bomb, not the bomb itself. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Well, point conceded. Apologies and thanks for that. Every day is a school day, as they say. Britmax (talk) 21:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Thanks Hawkeye7 for your expertise, good humour and time in training newcomers in Bhutan-Australia Wiki Project. Doctor 17 (talk) 09:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Congrats on the Triple Crown! You are only the third ever winner of the Marco Polo Centurion Triple Crown. You might be interested in a userbox I made, {{User crown|Marco}}:

— Bilorv (talk) 21:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Oh wow!! And thankyou for the userbox too! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:45, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

15:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume XII, Issue IV, April 2022 Headlines Australia report: Growing the record of Australian Music Belgium report: About African Pagnes and Belgian music Brazil report: Brazil wins the first place in WLM 2021 France report: French GLAM meeting Italy report: Work with GLAMs on Wikisourse and Wikimedia Commons Mexico report: GLAM professionals add an image and become Wikipedians; Edificio Carolino Edit-a-thon New Zealand report: People in Paleontology, Digikult, and copyright term extension for New Zealand Nigeria report: Wikidata for Nigerian Novelist and Novel Poland report: Wikiresidence in progress and workshop Evolution in GLAM in Poland Serbia report: Important activities within the GLAM Sweden report: Training at the National Archives of Sweden; Training at the Stockholm City Museum; Training at the Swedish National Museum of Science and Technology; Improved images from Swedish Performing Arts Agency Switzerland report: Wikidata Coffee Breaks UK report: Khalili Collections Uruguay report: Wikimedistas de Uruguay report USA report: WVU Libraries; Earth Day-2022-SWC; Wiki-Gap AvoinGLAM report: Open Access vs NFT, GLAM School, Saami language, family trees Content Partnerships Hub report: Enter our logo competition; IGO/INGO; Needs assessments research results; Wrapping up some ISA-things WMF GLAM report: 1Lib1Ref, Image Description Week, Commons calls, and the Add an image events Calendar: May's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

18:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for writing this. I was going to just do a DYK review for you, but the more I read, the more I liked the article/list. Pretty neat. Good work on your part. — Maile (talk) 00:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

@Hawkeye7: Looks like it's been a few years since you've submitted at FLC. I'm not sure if the "scope row" thing is recent, or if it's even a requirement. The coding is for screen readers for the visually impaired. The table at Pershing House is how I did it on that one. If you want to take a chance that it's not a requirement, then we don't add that unless it comes up on the review. But if you want to fix the table ahead of time to include that, I think you need to rework the framework on the table. Have a look at how other FLCs are doing that. Play around with it and see what you think. — Maile (talk) 04:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Welcome, crown recipient. Wait hold on, it says that you got like 100! Thats impressive! -Dogger Knight Dogger Knight (talk) 15:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2406:5A00:F005:B800:D50F:32B4:164E:730D (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)"}}

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Hawkeye7. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hawkeye7. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Hawkeye7|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

• I am not now nor have I even been paid for any editing. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I have zero doubts of your statement Hawkeye7. I have zero belief you're a paid editor and the claims that you are are completely without merit. Canterbury Tail talk 18:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Hawkeye, you recently wrote, "We tried to ensure that people everywhere in the world could access the Wikipedia without charge (free beer) but American Wikipedians (and perhaps more importantly corporate America) were against it and Wikimedia backed down." and I'm wondering what event/discussion/whatever that refers to? Levivich 01:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

It was called Wikipedia Zero. The idea was that people around the world (but particularly in developing countries) would be able to access Wikipedia free of charge. This was done through deals with providers in many countries. American Wikipedians had objections to this on ideological grounds: the implicit endorsement of the concept that Wikipedia being free meant free as in free beer; and the explicit endorsement of the concept of being charged different rates for access to different web sites, as opposed to what is called net neutrality. The project was abandoned, but it had many beneficial effects while it lasted. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

00:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Yuzuru Hanyu § "The Greatest" or "one of the greatest men's singles skater"?. Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 15:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

May songs

Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:28, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

I'm discovering a number of books in nuclear arms proliferation by Joseph Siracusa from Melbourne though there does not appear to be a article for him and his contributions to this field; is there a reason that he does not have a Wikipedia page, or is it notability? ErnestKrause (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Most likely because no one has written one. My experience with articles on academics is that good biographical sources are hard to find. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

20:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Project Pluto you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

I've just noticed your edit summary at Talk:Resource war and thought I'd explain that I added the template in that form because WP:MHA seems to suggest doing so. Looking at it now, maybe it doesn't suggest that, but when adding Wikiproject templates I'm probably usually an idiot in a hurry. If you've noticed others doing the same and it gets on your nerves/serves no purpose, you might think about revising the project page so it no longer seems to make that suggestion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rhea Seddon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 05:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

The article Rhea Seddon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rhea Seddon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 03:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William D. Leahy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 20:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

02:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

You need to answer at WT:DYK. It's your baby, and right now, I'm taking a sabbatical from DYK. Ping me when you nominate this at FLC. — Maile (talk) 10:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

The article Project Pluto you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Project Pluto for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

The article William D. Leahy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William D. Leahy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

The article William D. Leahy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William D. Leahy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 03:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the J. Robert Oppenheimer article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 16, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 16, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume XII, Issue V, May 2022 Headlines Albania report: Summer of Wikivoyage 2022 Argentina report: Face-to-face and virtual events on May Australia report: Over 1000 references added in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand for #1Lib1Ref Belgium report: New Wikidata Property Brazil report: Wiki Loves Espírito Santo is a sucess Estonia report: From university to library Finland report: Photowalks in Southern Finland, spring 2022 France report: International Museum Day 2022 India report: Digitization of Tibetan Buddhist canons, The International Museum Day 2022 Wikidata Competition Italy report: May in and for museums Kosovo report: Cooperation with the National Gallery of Kosova and Summer of Wikivoyage 2022 Malaysia report: WikiGap Malaysia 2022 @ Kuala Lumpur Library New Zealand report: Pacific Arts Aotearoa Wikiproject, Auckland Museum's Exploratory Study and Report back on #1Lib1Ref Poland report: Wikipedian in residence in the National Museum in Cracow; Training at the Wawel Royal Castle National Art Collection; How can we make GLAM’s digital resources more reusable in education?; The International Museum Day 2022 Wikidata Competition Serbia report: New GLAM brochure and Wikilive 2022 Sweden report: Rembrandt and others – drawings from the Nationalmuseum in Stockholm; Stockholm Museum of Women’s History; The map book of Heinrich Thome; Sörmland Museum; Wikidata competition – International Museum Day 2022 Switzerland report: Diversity in GLAM Program UK report: Khalili Collections Uruguay report: Wikimedistas de Uruguay report: 1bib1ref, Museum of Natural History, and more! USA report: Hackathons and Edit-a-thons Content Partnerships Hub report: International Energy Agency share their knowledge and graphics on Wikipedia Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: Uploading files to Wikimedia Commons with OpenRefine: looking for test uploads! WMF GLAM report: Results from 1Lib1Ref May 2022 Calendar: June's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

16:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi there. Can you make it so, when User:FACBot adds the newest featured lists to Template:Announcements/New featured content, it capitalizes the first letter? It looks a bit funny. Thanks! — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 00:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:44, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Four things:

• (1) Thanks for all of the extra tips. I have, as suggested, adjusted the Commons links, and added a number of additional references (which may satisfy the embedded requests for the insertion of more links to additional, relevant references in a number of sections).
• (2) Strange, and extremely interesting that you refer to "The Oarsmen".
  My old classmate, Kenneth G. Ross, was engaged for some considerable time in the (now completely abandoned by Ken) attempt to get support and interest in a film script, centred on the "Murray Cods" — Murray_Bridge, South Australia#Sport, and, also, Australia at the 1924 Summer Olympics#Rowing (also follow, at that second location, the links to each individual) — all of whom, I believe, although highly motivated (and collectively and severally highly skilled) rowers, were very greatly disillusioned and dis-satisfied with their lot in post-war-Australia ex-servicemen, who were desperately hoping (through their enterprise of rowing together once more) to capture some of their pre-war team-centred sense of belonging.
• (3) Also, FYI, in relation to what I am 100% convinced is the mis-identification of the "Maxfield" in the programme, and listed as one of those photographed, as the future Richmond footballer "Snowy" Maxfield, although at this stage, I have not been able to locate any sort of photographic verification, I have been able to make contact with a couple of genealogists whose work is, in part, centred on a group of "Maxfields" from Tasmania (around Launceston), a number of whom were also on Salisbury Plain at the time of the match, awaiting their move in late November to France and active duty. I'm currently waiting to see if they can provide any verification (or, at least, on-going advice)
  (Seems to me that, given age, height, weight, physical condition, etc. that it all adds up to: [78].)
• (4) At the moment, uncertain of how to go about the DYK and "on this day" entries. Once again, "Thanks" for your kindness, consideration, direction, advice, and support. Lindsay658 (talk) 06:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Just to let you know that I have done my best with the DYK submission that I have just made. Lindsay658 (talk) 10:29, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

The article Project Pluto you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Project Pluto for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

20:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

20:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Schierbecker (talk) 01:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Is there any chance you could give the above at least an image review? A full review would be even better but it may not be your sort of thing. Wehwalt (talk) 16:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:17, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Skirmish at Top Malo House you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kges1901 -- Kges1901 (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	For your review of "Mountain Commando at War." Balancing resources allocated to Special Forces as opposed to regular troops is a tricky question, but yes at the very least, SF can suck off the best of the recce platoons etc before they've had a chance to contribute properly in line battalions. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
• Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
• Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating Operation Bajrang. I was trying, but failed. As per Wiki, the article currently with 65 notable citations, can pass A-Class. Further, I shall expand with more contents for GA after it gets A-Class. As per Google book search, the operation has vast coverage. When I created the article, I was hesitant about CITEBOMBING, but now I understand that I can expand it for GA with more contents after roaming around Google book search and Newspaper search. Regards _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 23:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

No worries. The instructions are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/A-Class review#Requesting a review. Note that an A-class review is more stringent than a GA one, and is intended to prepare an article for FA. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

19:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Need your help paring down the Comments/post-cadet careers column at List of United States Military Academy First Captains. I've been fleshing out the Comments column, since there seems to be one reviewer who has been confused by lack of whatever they're looking for. I might be halfway down the list, as far as 1954 John C. Bard. IMO, it's getting too large at 93,017 bytes. And probably much, much larger than anyone would want to review. You can help by going through that column and removing what you think might be excess. How we deal with "I don't get it ... ", I don't know. Any ideas? — Maile (talk) 21:07, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

The article Skirmish at Top Malo House you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Skirmish at Top Malo House for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kges1901 -- Kges1901 (talk) 22:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of United States Military Academy First Captains/archive1 — Maile (talk) 16:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Hawkeye7 you need to dig in and start helping here, please. There are issues. Thanks. — Maile (talk) 21:45, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Hawkeye7 Left you a note at FLC. I've taken it as far as I can, at this point. Maybe you could look at it, and polish off the edits, if need be. I'm not sure what would require my participation from here, but I look forward to this becoming FL. — Maile (talk) 23:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Sure. You've done a great job on it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume XII, Issue VI, June 2022 Headlines Albania report: CEE Spring 2022 in Albania and Kosovo Argentina report: In the middle of new projects Australia report: A celebration, a commitment, an edit-a-thon: Know My Name returns for 2022 Belgium report: Heritage and Wikimedian in Residence Brazil report: FIRST WikiCon Brazil & Three States of GLAM Croatia report: Network(ing) effect(s) France report: French open content report promotion Italy report: Opening and closing projects in June Kosovo report: Edit-a-thon with Kino Lumbardhi; DokuTech; CEE Spring 2022 in Albania and Kosovo New Zealand report: West Coast Wikipedian at Large and Auckland Museum updates Poland report: Wikipedian in residence in the National Museum in Cracow; The next online meeting within the cycle of monthly editing GLAM meetings; Steps to communicate GLAM partnerships better and involve the Wikimedian community Sweden report: 100 000 memories from the Nordic Museum; Report from the Swedish National Archives Switzerland report: Diversity in GLAM Program UK report: Featured images and cultural diversity USA report: Fifty Women Sculptors; Juneteenth Edit-a-thon; Juneteenth Photobooths 2022; Wiknic June 2022; New York Botanical Garden June 2022; LGBT Pride Month Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: Structured data on Commons editing now possible with OpenRefine 3.6; file uploading with 3.7 Calendar: July's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

19:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edward N. Hall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eileen Collins you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 11:00, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

The article Eileen Collins you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eileen Collins for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 19:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 19,511 views (813.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 05:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

22:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

The article Eileen Collins you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eileen Collins for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 20:42, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

The article Edward N. Hall you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edward N. Hall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Hawkeye! Thanks for reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Royce Williams. But could you take another look at it? Thanks! MelanieN (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

19:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,591 views (632.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Would you GA review Fabio Miretti and Federico Gatti. I had nominated them in April but they haven't been seen yet. Dr Salvus 18:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't know why anyone would think I'm the goto person for articles on Italian soccer players; I know nothing about the subject. Nor, unfortunately, is three months a long time for a sports GA nomination — some have been waiting for much longer. (I have had sports articles take so long all the links rotted away in the meantime.) But since you asked, I have posted reviews, but they lack any technical insight. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

I was aware that you wouldn't be the goto. However, I think your review was quite good. Dr Salvus 20:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

I have fixed the timestamp. Are there any other problems? If not, please promote them. Dr Salvus 21:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

And Fabio Miretti? Dr Salvus 22:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Y John 19:30 Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:32, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

A lousy edit summary! Whether it was a Rollback or Undo, my edit summary and editing rationale remains valid. 1. I corrected MOS:DASH errors, and you put them back in. 2. Your "unambiguous location" rationale was explained in my second edit. E.g., we do not need to add "California" (etc.) to "Berkeley" when the publisher is the University of California (or New Mexico, etc.) So .... please keep the unneeded state locations as you desire, but do correct your hyphen editing errors. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 03:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 30 August 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 30, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

We may agree it isn't necessarily news to list every event for which Aldrin has been a grand marshal. It could be interesting to add one or a few. Here's one. nytimes.com/1977/09/19/archives/aldrin-is-race-grand-marshal.htmlPartTroix (talk) 21:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

21:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

"... to remove a gallstone that had lodged in her ureter."

Do you not understand how unlikely this is? If I said I was going to a dentist to have an infected eyelash removed from my big toe, you wouldn't question one or another part of that? As it is I don't know if this article has strayed into fantasy or hagiography. Could you verify that 'gallstone' from your sources? A 'kidney' stone would be so much less fantastical. And if the source was a newspaper or such, inserting a warning "[sic]" would be warranted. Shenme (talk) 02:30, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

The cited source says "a stone". Changed article to match the source. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:38, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tailhook scandal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 21:41, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

19:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

I noticed your comments on my UserTalk page regarding the Sally Ride and Kathryn D. Sullivan articles. While I unfortunately don't have a whole lot of experience with the Good Article or Featured Article nomination processes since I have only originally created one article on former Kentucky Governor John Y. Brown Jr. which passed a Good Article nomination albeit without any significant input from me, I am willing to help improve those article wherever possible. TommyBoy (talk) 19:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

No worries. I have brought the article up to the required standard and it has already passed GA. I have written or co-written 96 FAs and 340 GAs. I will handle the process, which will take about 90 days. I just needed a co-nominator. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm glad to hear that you were able to find somebody to assist you with that, but please free to let me know if I can help improve those articles in any way.--TommyBoy (talk) 20:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! I will keep you posted. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

The article Tailhook scandal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tailhook scandal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 21:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume XII, Issue VII, July 2022 Headlines Argentina report: Provinces: our main characters Brazil report: Brazil holds its National Wiki Conference, and many GLAM partners join Colombia report: A very busy July for Colombian libraries / Un Julio bastante movido para las bibliotecas colombianas France report: Wikimedian in residence in Clermont-Ferrand New Zealand report: News from Auckland Museum, the West Coast, and New Zealand's thesis repositories Poland report: Edit-a-thon in the National Museum in Cracow, GLAM editing contest on the collection of artworks Portugal report: Portugal’s first GLAM-Wiki open access museum project is launched!! Serbia report: Presentation of GLAM activities at Edu Wiki Camp UK report: Khalili Collections USA report: GLAM for the Masses AvoinGLAM report: Wikimania Content Partnerships Hub report: Wikimania activities WMF GLAM report: What next for 1Lib1Ref? Calendar: August's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia featured topics Title (Meghan Trainor album) featured content indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

See if you're happy with my abridgement of Freddie de Guingand. It's in that odd spot where the first paragraph seems too little, but the five-paragraph lead seems way too much, so I have to cut down a lot. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 20:17, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Dumpu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 04:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

21:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

00:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

The article Battle of Dumpu you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Dumpu for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, a week or two ago you rated Sundrum Castle for the Military history project. You'd marked that the B1 criteria wasn't met. I've since done some additional work on that article, so was wondering if you'd mind taking a 2nd look? If you think that's still not met, would you be able to provide any guidance for what it's missing? Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

B1 is one of the easiest to evaluate: the article has to be fully referenced, minimum one reference per paragraph. It still needs references for the last sentences of the third paragraph of "14th to 18th century", third paragraph of "20th and 21st century" and first paragraph of "Hamilton Wing" and the entire first paragraph of "Description". Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:52, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

That's helpful thank you! -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Hawkeye7, hopefully that's now sorted. Thanks again. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Re-rated to B class. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Falklands War

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

23:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

August songs

Congratulations! Today, we thank you for Judith Resnik, about "one of the original six American women astronauts who died in the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Anders you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 19:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi! I ran across this article when de-orphaning a few days ago. It looks similar to this article; I wanted to check if there's something I'm missing as they seem to be about the same topic. Thanks, Perfect4th (talk) 05:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

No, they are for the same event. Recommend reducing the former to a redirect to the latter. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

All right, thanks! Perfect4th (talk) 05:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anna Lee Fisher you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

The article William Anders you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William Anders for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Rupert Downes. — Bilorv (talk) 19:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations! Not many Four Awards given more than 15 years after the author created the article, but this is one of them. It isn't quite the largest creation-to-FA gap on the list, but I think 11 years 9 months is a record for GA-to-FA gap. In any case, it's a testament to how hard you've worked writing content for most of Wikipedia's existence. — Bilorv (talk) 19:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edgar Williams you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 20:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

The article Edgar Williams you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Edgar Williams for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 21:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

23:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

The article William Anders you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Anders for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 01:02, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

• FYI - I just nominated this to Template:Did you know nominations/William Anders. If you want to add author credits to anyone else, please do. --evrik ^(talk) 17:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

The article Anna Lee Fisher you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anna Lee Fisher for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 12:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the Operation Hurricane article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 3, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 3, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 7 reviews between April and June 2022. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 07:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Penney, Baron Penney you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 07:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

And again, I have confused the bot. [105]. Not a big deal, but is there a way that it can be corrected on Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Awards/ACM/Eligibility tracking? Hog Farm _Talk 23:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume XII, Issue VIII, August 2022 Headlines Albania report: Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos Campaign in Albania and Kosovo in 2022 Australia report: Introducing Wikidata to the City of Sydney Brazil report: In-person and online activities hosted by Brazil during Wikimania 2022 Estonia report: Summer in WMEE - from collecting professors´ portraits to new potential co-operations Germany report: Coins and paintings by the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation Indonesia report: 4 Islands Outreach; Digital Clippings; Balinese Wikisource Competition Italy report: Italian institutions ever closer to Wiki Loves Monuments Kosovo report: Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos Campaign and Wikivoyage Netherlands report: West Africa in the Van der Kraaij Photo Collection 1972-1987 New Zealand report: A Wikipedian at Large Poland report: The summary of GLAM editing contest and the end of residency at the National Museum in Cracow; Cooperation with Wawel Royal Castle; Hack(art)hon for Zachęta Portugal report: Linking Portuguese culture to Wikidata Serbia report: Contemporary Art Edit-a-thon and Wikipedian in residence at the Historical Archive of Negotin Sweden report: 100 000 Bildminnen; Uniforms, images from New Sweden, colonial officers, the map book of Fryderyk Getkant, and more!; Swedish general election 2022 UK report: Culturally diversifying Wikipedia Uruguay report: Wikimuseos & editing clubs in Uruguay USA report: Wikimania, Meetups and More AvoinGLAM report: Crisis & GLAM Content Partnerships Hub report: Tools; Helpdesk; IGO/INGO Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: New tool in development utilizing Structured Data WMF GLAM report: Capacity building for Bophana Center Calendar: September's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

01:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 6,953 views (579.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 21:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

The article Edgar Williams you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edgar Williams for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 23:21, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of United States Military Academy first captains, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Molesworth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, you rollbacked my edit here. Could you let me know why? Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 10:10, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

There is nothing wrong with the article. I will not permit maintenance banners under any circumstances. Note that 3RR does not apply to me. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

You are right, there is nothing wrong with the article itself at present. But it is not a maintenance banner. There are multiple copyright violations in the history of the article that need revision deletion. That template was there to request revision deletion. I don't see how 3RR is relevant here, or still how rollback was appropriate. --Ferien (talk) 10:16, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

It is today's featured article. There is special remit to protect it against vandalism. Take the maintenance banners someplace else. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:23, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

There was vandalism/copyright violations that needed to be RevDelled... by reverting that RevDel template, you were leaving these copyright violations in the history on today's featured article, which I'd argue is worse than leaving a tag on there that unregistered editors can't see and would probably be removed in a few hours. I do not see how you needed to note that "3RR does not apply to you" (even though it does, just considerable leeway is given to you), as I did not revert your edit and was not interested in doing so until this discussion was resolved. That is why I came here and didn't just revert back. You could even say this was an abuse of rollback on your end because you reverted a good-faith edit that was trying to help remove a copyright violation, and gave no explanation until I asked for it. --Ferien (talk) 10:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

And I would argue that placing a banner on the page is much worse than any copyright violation in the article history. Seek consensus before placing banners. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 11:10, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

There is no need for consensus to mark a copyright violation, according to Wikipedia:Copyright violations, which is not just a policy but also a policy with legal considerations. While I could have placed this on an admin's talk page, and will do in future for cases like these, there is nothing I can find saying I cannot tag the article itself, and you did not go to another admin to ask for RevDel, you just rollbacked my edit and left copyright violations in the history of the article. Seeing as you have not provided a reason for rollbacking my edit after I have asked 3 times why rollback was necessary, I'm going to move this discussion to WP:XRV. --Ferien (talk) 13:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrative action review regarding an action which you performed. Thank you. --Ferien (talk) 13:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of British logistics in the Western Allied Invasion of Germany at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Andrew🐉(talk) 11:33, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 22:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

The article William Penney, Baron Penney you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William Penney, Baron Penney for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 11:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

The article William Penney, Baron Penney you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Penney, Baron Penney for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

MediaWiki message delivery 00:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Apologies for having to amend your text, but though we should avoid double phrasing like that. Can you find the original WT:MILHIST discussion of Wiki-tan? Buckshot06 (talk) 06:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

No problems. I was about to amend it myself and got an edit conflict. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello Hawkeye7. Thank you for your input on my page Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten's wedding cakes regarding it being a notable subject. This is my first time having a talk page about any of my submissions so I'm not sure how to proceed. Could you let me know what I do next? I'm keen to get this right. Additionally, I don't know where I should make the amendment to the DYK tag line. Could you help me with that too? Thanks! BJCHK (talk) 07:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Hawkeye, let me be the first to congratulate on your well-deserved election as MilHist's Lead Coord -- your dedication to the project, and WP as a whole, is second to none. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

		Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history)
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for participating in 13 reviews between July and September 2022. Zawed (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,032 views (642.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 01:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

I see you are in a space related wiki. I'm curious what your opinion on Gateway Spaceport is. IMO it's dubious in prospect and also notability. Would you have any thoughts? Unbroken Chain (talk) 02:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Good morning Hawkeye, just a quick note to express my admiration for your work on the Featured topic Nuclear weapons and the United Kingdom. I also thought of suggesting Atomic Weapons Establishment as a potential candidate to include in this topic. Best regards, Whizz40 (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

		The Lead Coordinator stars
		On behalf of the members of WikiProject Military history, in recognition of your re-election to the position of Lead Coordinator, I take great pleasure in presenting you with the Lead Coordinator's stars, and wish you the best of luck for the coming year! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 18:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Hawkeye. I have provisionally scheduled Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign as the TFA for 4 November. Would you prefer to write the blurb, or are you happy for one to be produced for you? Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 07:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

I note that you have already been discussing one with Dank (in 2019). Are you ok to go with that one? Gog the Mild (talk) 12:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Yes, that one will be fine. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shannon Lucid you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 07:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

The article Shannon Lucid you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shannon Lucid for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 08:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign. — Bilorv (talk) 18:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume XII, Issue IX, September 2022 Headlines Albania report: Wiki Loves EuroPride in Albania Australia report: Behind the scenes with Australia's Wiki Loves Earth 2022 winner Austria report: A Börthday present for Wikidata - the DACH Culture Contest Brazil report: Reopening of Museu Paulista and other news France report: Meeting with Prime minister cultural adviser; Residence at the Brittany Museum India report: Digitisation of O Bharat, a bilingual biweekly published in Goa from 1912 to 1949 Indonesia report: GLAM Socialization; Wikistories for GLAM Competition Italy report: September month of results and planning Netherlands report: Wiki Loves Monuments Suriname first edition: 554 photos New Zealand report: New Zealand Thesis Project and Te Papa Forget-me-nots Poland report: The results of GLAM editing contest; GLAM Coordinators Meeting Serbia report: External projects, great results and high level of independence Sweden report: Bookfair back on site; Cultural history in High Schools; More identifiers from National Historical Museums of Sweden on Wikidata; Swedish general election 2022 Switzerland report: Swiss GLAM Programm UK report: Islamic art and global art USA report: Advocacy and Invention; New Smithsonian WiR; Called to Create; DC Statehood and Home Rule; Annual meeting; Wikipedian in Residence Opportunity at the Pérez Art Museum Miami Content Partnerships Hub report: Workshops on tool prioritization and helpdesk Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: View it! tool development update Calendar: October's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

14:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 10 November 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 10, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 23 November 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 23, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:59, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Oh My Gog. Articles on women don't fare well at TFA and although she is a Republican, she is closely associated with the Obama and Biden regimes. I fear that this may be a red rag to bovine vandals. I've never had a BLP TFA before. I think we will need Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

I'll put it on my watchlist for what it's worth. Excessive vandalism (beyond what's "normal" for TFA) is usually stamped on fairly quickly these days; the old orthodoxy of "thou shalt not protect the TFA" is largely gone. But pre-emptive protection is still not the done thing. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Harry. That's understood. Much appreciated. NASA Astronaut Group 2 came under very heavy attack for some reason. Kathryn D. Sullivan is a BLP, so we should take more care than usual. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

This hook reached the stats, only the routine didn't pick it up because the article was moved during the day. See User talk:Amakuru: working on it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Oh! I did not know that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 17 September 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 20:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

September music

Thank you today for the article, introduced: "This article is about the Next Nine, the nine astronauts selected for Projects Gemini and Apollo in 1962. They were the next most famous group after the Mercury Seven, although few astronauts are much remembered today. They are also widely regarded as the best group ever chosen. Six of the nine flew to the Moon (Lovell and Young twice), and Armstrong, Conrad and Young walked on it as well. Seven of the nine were awarded the Congressional Space Medal of Honor (one posthumously)."! - It's amazing what's going on on your talk between announcement and appearance, thanks for new FA and GAs and DYKs also! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

... and today I wrote an article about music premiered today, Like as the hart. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

travel and strings sound --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

And thank you for the music. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello Hawkeye7,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hanford Site, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Meet some of the project coordinators

MediaWiki message delivery 21:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

I'm reverting your reversion. Could we discuss how you feel a previous version "is better?"Defcool1 (talk) 21:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

It has a lot of problems:

• McDivitt's date of birth was removed. This removes a referenced fact, which you are not supposed to do. His name and birth date would then have to be removed from lead and infobox too, as it would no longer be referenced
• There's a typo in the caption
• MOS:CAPS issues

The removal of references imperils the article's Good Article rating. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

If you want to work on an astronaut article, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Adopt an astronaut, pick one, and bring it to Good Article status. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

It's of little use talking to him about article quality. He's been trolling almost every article I have taken to ITN recent deaths this month (McDivitt being one of them). I (and other editors) have tried to tell him how his edits are not constructive, but he just responds with personal attacks [126][127][128][129]. —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 21:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

October music

Thank you today for Operation Hurricane, "about Britain's first nuclear test, which was conducted in Western Australia in 1952. Britain became the third nuclear power after the United States and the Soviet Union."! - ... and also for all the other good things since its TFA announcement: more featured material, and the election! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

who shall separate us --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

leaving the month with reformation and a cat treat --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 21:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Why? Doodoodave (talk) 22:57, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Never change the variation of English in an article. (WP:ENGVAR) No other changes were worth retaining. Do not substitute templates for the ndash characters. (WP:DASH) Do not bypass redirects. (WP:NOTBROKEN) Do not introduce factual errors by changing place names. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is

• Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
• Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
• BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
• Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
• Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
• Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
• PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
• Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.

• Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
• Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
• Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
• Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
• Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
• SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
• Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
• Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
• Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
• Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 00:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Hawkeye7, i had a quick question regarding this blurb for this article. would it be appropriate to remove the mention of mountains being a restriction to the aircraft? my understanding is that, once an aircraft is airborne, mountains are no longer a significant hindrance. perhaps "the mountains and weather, and" could be replaced with "the weather and". dying (talk) 22:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Not entirely true. In those days they had to fly between rather than over the mountains. But changed as suggested. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

haha, that's true! i had figured that they would still be a hindrance, though perhaps not one significant enough to warrant a mention in the blurb. thanks, Hawkeye7! dying (talk) 22:40, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the 1991 Gulf War air campaign Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

This Month in GLAM – Volume XII, Issue X, October 2022 Headlines Albania report: Wikimedian in Residence in Albania Australia report: Celebrating Wikidata, and over 400 new Wikipedia pages Brazil report: WLM Brazil, HR & Environment Wikicontest, and GLAM with Atlantic Forest National Institut Estonia report: Chuvash people in WMEE and Photo contest Indonesia report: GLAM Talk; Javanese Wikisource Workshop Italy report: Touring Club Italiano: updates and uploads Netherlands report: About the Dutch Wiki Loves Fashion 2022 New Zealand report: TDWG2022 and Molluscs Poland report: Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 selection process in progress; GLAM online meeting on evaluation of ten editions Wiki Loves Monuments in Poland Serbia report: GLAMorous October; Faculty of Dramatic Arts in Belgrade; CEE Meeting Sweden report: Women and architechture Switzerland report: Swiss GLAM Program UK report: Khalili Foundation USA report: Asian American Edit-a-thons and More Content Partnerships Hub report: First batch upload; list of tools Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: View it! tool: now with Commons category search! WMF GLAM report: AfLIA Wikisource webinar, Wiki Rescues Manuscripts & European GLAMwiki Coordinators meeting Calendar: November's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

I nominated Space Shuttle Columbia disaster for GA a few months ago and it's been languishing since. If you have the time, I would appreciate it getting a review. Thanks! Balon Greyjoy (talk) 12:59, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Sure. Will do. Won't be able to review for a few days though. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 17:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 21:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Just wanted to offer a word of thanks for shepherding the GA process on T.E. Lawrence. I am not by any measure a heavyweight contributor but have, over the years, put massive amounts of work into that; watching the GA process was super-educational and pleasing. Thanks!Tim Bray (talk) 21:49, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Consider nominating the article at Did you know and/or Featured article candidates. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hanford Engineer Works you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 04:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Not sure why or how that happened - sorry about interfering with your talk item at Nick's, for a moment I thought my account had been hijacked, but it must have been something else.

JarrahTree 00:59, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

The article Hanford Engineer Works you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hanford Engineer Works for comments about the article, and Talk:Hanford Engineer Works/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 02:04, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 8 December 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/December 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 15:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

November songs

Thank you today for the article, introduced (in 2018): "We decided to split the logistics of the campaign off into its own article. I think the results justify the decision."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:48, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you today for Kathryn D. Sullivan, introduced: "Sullivan was selected as a NASA astronaut candidate with NASA Astronaut Group 8, the first group to include women; the group also included Sally Ride and Judith Resnik. Unlike them, Sullivan is still alive, and is currently serving as a scientific advisor to President Joe Biden. She has flown in space and descended to the deepest point in the world's oceans."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article British logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation. I've put my initial suggestions here. Spicemix (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your review! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:06, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 20:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

While, certainly, any comment you might have on my current FAC, Roanoke Island, North Carolina, half dollar would be very welcome, could I get to look at a GAC I've started, for New Jersey's 1927 biannual elections proposal? I'm sure it will wind up at FAC sooner or later. Many thanks. Wehwalt (talk) 21:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 00:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 00:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

		The Military history A-Class cross with Oak Leaves
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class cross with Oak Leaves for British logistics in the Siegfried Line campaign, American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign, American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign, Freddie de Guingand, and Harry Crerar. Hog Farm (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at British Territorials in India Interview: On turning 200 (issues of the Bugle!) Review essay: Coordinators' 2022 reading list Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

This Month in GLAM – Volume XII, Issue XI, November 2022 Headlines Africa report: Wiki Loves Africa 2022 Winners & 2022 ISA Drive Albania report: An event at the National History Museum in Tirana Brazil report: WLM tool, Wiki Takes, New WMB's Strategy, and 2 new GLAMs India report: Two Open Culture films on India's Odia language, made with volunteer labour Indonesia report: Open GLAM Conference; Sundanese Wikisource Workshop; Minangkabau books digitization Italy report: Video and photo to share the beauty of Italy's heritage Netherlands report: Linking heritage data at HackaLOD New Zealand report: Integrating with the BHL, loading natural science specimens and data Poland report: How Wiki helps to explore and enjoy art & culture; Wiki workshop for the National Museum in Krakow; GLAM online meeting on ideas for 2023; Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 Serbia report: Wikipedian in residence at Faculty of Dramatic Arts in Belgrade and National Museum of Zrenjanin Sweden report: Wikipedian in Residence at Musikverket; Women and architecture; Gymnasiearbete; New uploads from the Swedish National Archives; WLM winners; Images of Äpplet Switzerland report: Swiss GLAM Program UK report: Khalili Foundation Uruguay report: Let's GLAM Together in Uruguay: Help us organize the GLAM Wiki Conference 2023 USA report: WikiConference North America 2022; Punk Wikipedia Edit-a-thon; Kensho Technologies Impact-a-thon Special story: We need your opinion: GLAM Wiki Conference 2023 & Your Favorite Tools Content Partnerships Hub report: Survey: your favorite tools Calendar: December's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Looking for someone who might be able to help with either the image or source review at the FAC for James Madison. Any chance that you could look at it? ErnestKrause (talk) 16:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 23:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

The article British logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:British logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany for comments about the article, and Talk:British logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:40, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Hawkeye. I am planning on running both Rhea Seddon and American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign as TFAs in February. Would you like to draft the blurbs or prefer me to have a go? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:05, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Y Drafted; see Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Rhea Seddon/archive1 and Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign/archive2. But American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign has not yet been promoted. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:16, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. Nice work. I am assuming that it will have been by February. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:22, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the A-Class review you put in at Thomas Hardy (Royal Navy officer, died 1732). The article is now at FAC, and I wondered whether you might like to stick your oar in there too? Thanks again either way, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:32, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 23:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

A very happy Christmas and New Year to you!
Have a great Christmas, and may 2023 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from Krampus! Cheers SchroCat (talk) 11:11, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}}

Donner60 (talk) 00:55, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

		Happy Holidays
		Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 17:29, 25 December 2022 (UTC)