The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Woodlem Education (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage from multiple independent reliable sources, majority sources are unreliable and PR stuff, fails GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. GrabUp - Talk 09:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Education, Schools, United Arab Emirates, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article was improperly moved to mainspace without waiting for the AfC process to complete, the article is largely promotional, and maintenance tags have been removed without being addressed. Caleb Stanford (talk) 22:01, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: As per nomination. Clearly fails WP:GNG. Zuck28 (talk) 22:16, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Unable to find secondary sourcing even for GNG, but Woodlem Education is a private company founded primarily by Noufal and Asmal Ahmed in 2017, its current directors. It is a private for profit company based in Dubai. Per WP:NSCHOOL, For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and thus must meet WP:NCORP. The promotional information on the various schools will not do. We require WP:CORPDEPTH level sources specifically about the company. These must be secondary sources. We do not have those and after some careful searching, I do not think such sources exist. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:23, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom and page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organization. Poor sources on the page. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. RangersRus (talk) 15:48, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this clearly fails GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. Delete as per nomination. Written as promotional piece, lacking secondary sources. Rahmatula786 (talk) 08:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.