The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 16:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Catie Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Add Cathryn (Catie) Phipps, Phipps Institute, Catherine Phipps and American dietology to this nomination. Corvus cornix_talk 05:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable person. A Google search for '"Catie Smith" dietology' comes up with a grand total of 56 hits. Only 9 hits for "American dietology". Seems like self-promotion. Corvus cornix_talk 05:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I would also vote to delete the other articles this editor has added tonight, as they all appear to be the same unformatted information about non-notables, and possible copvios as well. These should probably have been CSD'ed, in fact.Dayewalker (talk) 05:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Self-promotion. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "bio-chemical infarctions". Gobbledygook. Corvus cornix_talk 06:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- these are pasted, nonencyclopedic essays. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 07:29, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.