Hello, Masstic, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Masstic, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 20:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jhonson Napoleon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jhonson Napoleon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. If this block is based off of private evidence, it can additionally be appealed to the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.

A tag has been placed on Stéphane Vincent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fantom (rapper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantom (rapper) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masstic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi @Vanamonde93:,

I see that my account is blocked on Wikipedia. I don't even know what caused this blocking. I do my best to respect Wikipedia's rules. I'm surprised that my account is blocked. I don't create any pages for compensation. I created and edited them because I believe it's necessary to contribute to the Wikipedia encyclopedia. I would sincerely like to know the reasons that suddenly caused my blocking on the Wiki. If I made a mistake that led to my blocking without my knowledge, I am sincerely sorry. But honestly, the reason given is false. I am not paid to edit Wikipedia. I understand that Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and that I must respect all established principles, which I strive to do, but I am not paid to edit the Wiki. With all due respect, I request that my user page be unblocked, please.

Sincerely, Masstic (talk) 07:01, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In reviewing this matter, I have come to the same conclusion as the blocking administrator. Note that paid editing is not limited to specific payment for contributions. 331dot (talk) 09:02, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I removed your duplicate request, only one open request is needed at a time(placed at the bottom, to keep posts in order). You are addressing the blocking admin, but unblock requests are to ask for a third party to review the block. If you would first like to negotiate with the blocking admin, you don't need to make an unblock request. Would you like to negotiate with the blocking admin, or would you like this reviewed by a third party? 331dot (talk) 08:06, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer that an uninvolved CU look at this. I would also ask that they look at this user's deleted contributions when responding to the unblock request. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm waiting for you and I look forward to hearing your verdict on this matter. Because I wasn't paid to contribute to Wikipedia. Thank you again.

Sincerely, Masstic (talk) 23:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Vanamonde93:,

I have not received any response to my request. I would like to remind you, dear administrator, that I have not received any compensation for my contributions on the Wiki. Please unblock my user page.

Sincerely, Masstic (talk) 03:37, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]