Hello, Malkawi99! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 20:25, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, Malkawi99. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--مصعب (talk) 12:09, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating List of people from Irbid, Malkawi99!

Wikipedia editor Icewhiz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs sources. Red-links (not existing articles) in list should be considered.

To reply, leave a comment on Icewhiz's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Icewhiz (talk) 19:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this information Malkawi99 (talk) 20:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Malka, Jordan, Malkawi99!

Wikipedia editor Icewhiz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Notable figures here possibly questionable, sources required for rest of the article (you are sourcing the people, not the actual content on the town).

To reply, leave a comment on Icewhiz's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Icewhiz (talk) 19:53, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this information Malkawi99 (talk) 20:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• If you wish to request an unblock, do so here per the above notice.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:52, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Malkawi99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi @Bbb23:. First, thank you for your responsding to my request. Second, I want to tell you that the ban that you prevented to me from using the English Wikipedia on 27 December 2017 was the first prevent to me. I think that your sentence was harsh for me because you prevented me from English Wikipedia permanent prevention without receiving any warnings from anyone before the ban. I think it was cruel and unworthy punishment for me. And the issue of multiple accounts I did not know that it is prohibited, and I did not create it to avoid any prevention because I originally did not prevent before, and I made it in the name of الملكاوي, even if I want to hide and be careful and undercover I would choose the name of non-Malkawi but I was frank. So I hope to remove the ban because I was unaware of the policies.-- Malkawi99 (talk) 22:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"I was unaware of the policies" is not a pass to violate them. SQL^{Query me!} 02:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Malkawi99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, for anyone who reads what I write, I hope this text finds you well. I ask for forgiveness for my mistake, and would like to have my ban removed for several reasons. First of all, I am aware that what I did four years ago about the issue of creating the two accounts is wrong, and I apologize for any mistake I made. I swear I was not aware of the policies and instructions. At that time, I was a school student, and I was ignorant of everything about Wikipedia. Currently, I became aware of the policies, and has a good behavior in Arabic Wikipedia. I am an editor (محرر) in the Arabic Wikipedia. Also, I am in my final year at university and I am studying English literature, so I am interested in English. I think the ban is harsh, and it is no longer necessary because I understand what is forbidden to me, and I will not do it again, and instead I will make productive contributions, from which Wikipedia will develop and my English will improve. The ban that permanently prevented me from editing on the English Wikipedia on December 27, 2017 was my first ban. However, I was banned without receiving any warnings from anyone before the ban. Therfore, I think that the ban is unfair and has been around for a long time. In the end, I'd like to say that I do not like anyone to get a bad impression of me, so I would like to change my behavior here in particular.

Anyone here can ask about my behavior in the Arabic Wikipedia, because I've had a good behavior in the past three years.

Accept reason:

It's been several years, and you've apparently become a constructive editor on other projects. I'm unblocking you so that you can have a second chance on English Wikipedia. Please be aware that rules can differ between projects, so you should take a look at our local policies and guidelines. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@علاء: I'm sorry to bother you with our wiki-drama, but do you have any input on this editor's behavior on Arabic Wikipedia? Our unblocking process encourages blocked editors to contribute to sister projects, which counts in their favor. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NinjaRobotPirate, hope you are doing well, and I am happy to help We faced the same issue with Malkawi99 at Arabic Wikipedia before 3 years, and blocked him three times on arwiki. After talking with him, we found that all of his "wrong/bad" edits were caused by his lack of knowledge of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, so some arwiki users helped him to understand these policies, and actually his contributions have improved greatly since the beginning of 2019 and he is now an active contributor on Arabic Wikipedia. Best --Alaa :)..! 11:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malkawi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malkawi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 16:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Al-Wad Sayed Al-Shaghal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Wad Sayed Al-Shaghal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 09:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ramez Movie Star, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presenter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I just wanted to post this to let you know that you seem to have implemented a semi-protected edit request at 7 April 2022 over at Talk:Jean-Claude Van Damme but you didn't mark the request as answered. You can do so by changing the |answered parameter on the edit request from 'no' to 'yes'. Doing so will make sure other editors aren't stumbling across the edit request looking to implement it only to find it's already been implemented. It's also courteous to leave a message on the edit request that it's been implemented by you and I believe it's mandatory to include attribution in the edit summary such as "Implementing edit request by <x> - <reason>" because of copyright reasons.

Of course it's also totally possible that you didn't see the edit request and just implemented the change on your own accord, in which case you can ignore this message.

Thanks anyway for the contribution(s) and all the best. ★Ama ^{TALK CONTRIBS} 13:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Malkawi99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 213.139.52.204. Today, I opened Wikipedia to start editing but was shocked that my IP address has been globally blocked by @ST47: ProxyBot. It is shown that the IP address or range 213.139.52.204 has been globally blocked (disabled) by him. I think I did nothing wrong. However, my block will expire in 5 days but I want to know further information to avoid any issues. It is shown that I was blocked since I change my IP address by proxying my browsing traffic through another user's computer. I don't use VPN or something like that, but nowadays, I am working from home as a data associate at Amazon. Our working depends on using VPN, so I connect VPN on other cities to work on data. And I connect my computer to my home wifi which I use it in editing on Wikipedia. Is this related to the issue? Malkawi99 (talk) 22:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I can't speak on many of the technical aspects you are referring to, but it appears you are able to edit from this account again. If this is a reoccurring issue, you may want to request an IP block exemption on your account through the UTRS. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The article Ameer Al-Thalaam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I see that you are senior editor than me. But, the page you created today seem not to fullfill Wikipedias notablity criteria that it is much of Origional research, no adequate indepth reference presented to show the nitability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Instant History (talk) 21:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Malkawi99, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sohaib Al-Malkawi, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sohaib Al-Malkawi.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Clearfrienda}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Clearfrienda ^💬 02:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You don't have the access (WP:FMV, WP:RPC and WP:RBK) set on your user page. Please read WP:UP Claggy (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Claggy I think I added them by mistake years ago. However, I just removed them. Thanks! Malkawi99 (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Claggy (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wives of Hussein of Jordan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content fork from Hussein of Jordan#Personal life. Details are already in other articles. Unnecessary duplication.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrKay (talk) 15:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wives of Hussein of Jordan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wives of Hussein of Jordan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DrKay (talk) 05:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of directors of the Jordanian General Intelligence Department, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Garsh (talk) 21:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aref I wanted to reach out to suggest a new article you could write about one of the pioneers of English Linguistics in Jordan, would you be interested in creating one?

Hi. Yes, I'd be happy to create an article as long as the individual meets the notability guidelines. feel free to share more details, and I'll take a look. Malkawi99 (talk) 16:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Princess Iman bint Hussein bin Abdullah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

At 6 months old, too young to determine if she will ever become notable. Notability is not INHERITED.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Malkawi99. Thank you for your work on Nimr ibn Adwan. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article June 2025 Iranian strikes on Israel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June 2025 Iranian strikes on Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Al-Tameen Building. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and It also needs more sourcing so as to satisfy WP:VERIFY.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:01, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Newslinger. An edit that you recently made to Talk:Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present) seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This also applies to talk page discussions. LLM-generated comments are not acceptable, especially when not disclosed. — Newslinger talk 15:33, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As a note, there is a distinction between using machine translation services such as Google Translate, which may use LLMs in their technical implementation but still aim to create a faithful translation of your text in the target language, and AI chatbots such as ChatGPT, which generate all kinds of outputs including ones that are not translations of your text. The use of machine translation services is acceptable in some cases when not done disruptively, but the use of AI chatbots is often problematic for the reasons listed at WP:LLM. — Newslinger talk 15:36, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — Newslinger talk 15:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please note that your recent editing has also spanned articles covered under the following contentious topics:

• Post-1978 Iranian politics (WP:CT/IRP)
• Articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles (WP:CT/BLP)

Thank you. — Newslinger talk 15:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Newslinger:,

Thanks for your message and for clarifying the contentious topics. It seems there might have been some misunderstanding. I haven't edited the Arab–Israeli conflict article, nor have I ever been interested in or even read Wikipedia content related to the Syrian Civil War or Islamic State at all. If I did make any edits to these that I wasn't aware of, I'd appreciate it if you could point them out to me so I can avoid any mistakes... What I did recently was on an article about the Iran–Israel conflict, where I noticed my country (Jordan) was listed as a party to the conflict, so I removed it. After it was re-added, I opened a discussion on the talk page to work toward a shared conclusion. I want to emphasize that I'm careful with these topics, and I make it a point to follow policies, and I alwyas always prefer constructive discussion over edit warring.

Best regards, and thanks again.. Malkawi99 (talk) 19:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Malkawi99, the contentious topics and broader general sanctions systems apply to entire topic areas, and not just individual articles. Your edits to Talk:Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present), including Special:Diff/1297414699, are covered under the Arab–Israeli conflict topic area (WP:CT/A-I).

On June 19, you made the edit Special:Diff/1296276858 to the article Iran–Israel proxy war, which is covered under the Syrian Civil War and ISIL topic area (WP:GS/SCW). Even though your edit is not related to the Syrian Civil War or ISIL, the entire article is covered by a one-revert rule restriction because the article as a whole overlaps with that topic area.

I'd like to reiterate that these notices about contentious topics and general sanctions are intended to be informative and, per their wording, receiving them "does not imply that there are any issues with your editing". Many editors participating in contentious topic areas receive these notices on a regular basis. I did post my concern about your LLM (AI chatbot) use in a different section, #July 2025, but that is separate from these notices. — Newslinger talk 13:54, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Malkawi99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Al-Tameen Building, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Malkawi99. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Al-Tameen Building".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:27, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]