User talk:Hazeldall

CS1 error on Deuterated drug

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Deuterated drug, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:49, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sheila DeWitt

Information icon Hello, Hazeldall. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sheila DeWitt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sheila DeWitt

Hello, Hazeldall. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sheila DeWitt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheila DeWitt (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spinster300 (talk) 16:26, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Hazeldall! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 16:26, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheila DeWitt has been accepted

Sheila DeWitt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 02:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Hazeldall. Thank you for your work on Sheila DeWitt. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

With her two ACS awards she qualifies under WP:NPROF#C2 and perhaps also C7. The draft should probably have been accepted earlier. Please add a scientist Infobox.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 02:50, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]