This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance). Film: Indian This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Sush150 per the official teaser poster, Shraddha is credited before Ranbir. Please stop edit-warring. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Krimuk2.0 so that logic as per official teaser on YouTube Ranbir name write before shraddha. Please stop edit-warring. Sush150 (talk) 07:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, in the video itself Shraddha's name is before Ranbir. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:04, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, as per Wiki rules mentioned at Template:Infobox film: "use the billing block of the poster for the film's original theatrical release as a rule of thumb for listing starring actors". The poster, not the YouTube title. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:06, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I attach a picture of the movie leads while shooting for the film in the production section? Greatly influenced (talk) 13:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

86.98.10.122 (talk) 08:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This will be Shraddha's Comeback after Baaghi 3(2020)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 08:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

before omitting it , kindly check. Its from a reliable source. It's from Amar ujala. Largest hindi daily newspaper. Give respect to well reputed print media's too that is serving the Country since decades. Calling such well reputed newspapers as non reliable is not right. Happy holi.  PrasenjiSpeaks (talk) 06:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tu Jhoothi Main Makkaar budget is approximately 70 crore but in this article it is 200 crore. It must be corrected. Because Ranbir Kapoor did not charge any fee from Luv Ranjan. So How can movie budget be 200 cr because it is Rom Com movie, not an action movie. https://www.india.com/video-gallery/tu-jhoothi-main-makkar-star-cast-fees-ranbir-kapoors-salary-for-the-film-will-shock-you-checkout-how-much-other-actors-charged-watch-5868795/ Greek Goddessss (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Greek Goddessss As noted in the article, there are reliable sources supporting the 200 cr budget. The usual approach for Wikipedia articles when reliable sources differ on this is to mention a range and ideally include discussion on this in the article body. Ravensfire (talk) 05:13, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sacnilk is a much reliable source and it says 70cr approx and even Box office India says 110cr max so it should be 70-110cr Est. https://www.sacnilk.com/articles/entertainment/box_office/Tu_Jhoothi_Main_Makkar_2023_Box_Office_Collection_Day_Wise_Worldwide?hl=en Randomjoe6565 (talk) 12:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Every source is giving a different budget so for now we will remove it and when the movies run ends all news articles will state if its a hit or a superhit etc then we will know the proper budget Repto79456 (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The budget information given in this article is wrong because firstly it was 70 cr in india tv article. then an another article publish wrong information that budget is 200 cr without proper source. please correct this information to previous one which was 70 cr.

https://www.india.com/video-gallery/tu-jhoothi-main-makkar-star-cast-fees-ranbir-kapoors-salary-for-the-film-will-shock-you-checkout-how-much-other-actors-charged-watch-5868795/ Greek Goddessss (talk) 10:08, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. There is currently no information on the budget in this article. Actualcpscm (talk) 10:36, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tu jhooti mai makkar budget is 75 crores WITHOUT ANY PRINTING AND ADVERTISING COST , IF ADDED THEN TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET WILL BE 95 CRORES please update this information 2400:1A00:BD11:7F7F:D996:1427:B5DE:156D (talk) 04:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Budget - 70-110 crores

Source 1 - https://www.sacnilk.com/articles/entertainment/box_office/Tu_Jhoothi_Main_Makkar_2023_Box_Office_Collection_Day_Wise_Worldwide?hl=en

Source 2 - https://www.bollymoviereviewz.com/2023/03/tu-jhoothi-main-makkaar-day-4-box-office-collection.html

Source 3 - https://www.boxofficebusiness.in/2023/03/tu-jhoothi-main-makkar-day-3-box-office-collection-and-budget.html Randomjoe6565 (talk) 12:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: There are also sources (in article) for a 200cr budget. Wikipedia presents the ranges that sources gives when reliable sources differ. Also, note that Sacnilk.com is not considered a reliable source and bollymoviereviewz.com is questionable at best (see WP:ICTFSOURCES). Ravensfire (talk) 14:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Different sources publishing a wide range of budget. Wait for the film ran out of the threaters and critics publishing its economics. Please don't publish any budget, and discuss your opinion in this talk page. Tousif.15 (talk) 12:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tousif.15: Which all are those different sources? Can you please mention them here. SuperSharanya (talk) 12:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

INDIA.COM site mentions the budget is 75cr. Whereas BOI mentions it as 110cr. ABP News reports the budget to be 90cr. I don't why this article is relying on the budget reported by PinkVilla as the latter mentioned sites are more reliable. Ranbir hasn't even charged the fee yet and 175cr. is too huge to be a budget for a romcom. The budget is in the range of 75cr.-110cr.

Greatly influenced (talk) 08:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Greatly influenced India.com is unreliable per WP:ICTFSOURCES. Where are the sources of BOI and ABP News? SuperSharanya (talk) 08:53, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] this is the report by ABP News, a reputed news site which mentions the budget is 95cr. Greatly influenced (talk) 07:20, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this may be considerable, can you find another reputed secondary sources citing budget in same range as above. Tousif.15 (talk) 09:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Greatly influenced: English refs are more reliable than other languages refs in Wikipedia. SuperSharanya (talk) 10:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that The Financial Express and PinkVilla article is reliable then so does that ABP News article, it doesn't matter what language when the reliability of the sources are near to the range of more possibility. Greatly influenced (talk) 18:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If there is English refs, it is more reliable. See WP:NONENG. SuperSharanya (talk) 09:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SuperSharanya @Greatly influenced You guys are indulge in an edit war for more than two weeks, making edit history for the page a totally mess. It looks so annoying. It need to be stopped otherwise you both will be blocked for editing this page once again for longer duration. @Greatly influenced Give me your concern why you think that budget is not 200 cr and @SuperSharanya you concern why you want budget to be 200 cr. Tousif ● 📲 16:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To knowledge budget to people. Let me ask, where is a reliable source that says below ₹200 crore? SuperSharanya (talk) 16:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SuperSharanya: You have misunderstood WP:NONENG. It does not say that sources written in English are more reliable than sources written in other languages.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1 I'm signing off from this discussion. Can I withdrew my comments from this discussion? SuperSharanya (talk) 07:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. Deleting comments after other people have replied to them is not permitted.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Budget of the movie should be changed from 110cr to 200cr , In this article it is 110cr but the actual budget of the movie is 200cr according to box office india which is the most credible trade portal for Bollywood movies Producer bushan kumar also said that the movie had a budget of 200cr+

https://boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=7627 Skrish16 (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: You are already autocomfirmed [2] and should be able to edit the article itself Lightoil (talk) 08:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TJMM Budget not correct, the budget is approximately Rs 70-100 crores and the film has done a business of Rs 149.05 crores in India which makes the film a Superhit. Kindly correct the budget and write- the film was a box office Superhit instead of failure. 14.102.17.152 (talk) 11:44, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there is no use of saying this to these people,they just believe in false news and want to degrade a successful film. They are behaving like this platform is gifted by their dad Pooja editor (talk) 21:50, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

''Tu Jhoothi Main Makkaar'' is not the tenth highest grossing Indian film of 2023 anymore. It has been surpassed by another Indian-Telugu language movie "Waltair Veerayya'' by "Mythri Movie Makers''. Tu Jhoothi Main Makkaar's box office collection is 220.10 crores totally while Waltair Veerayya's box office collection is 240 crores hence surpassing Tu Jhoothi Main Makkaar. SRKFan1965 (talk) 14:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This movie is Hit and not failure. Idk where you guys get the results from. It was declared super hit at box-office and the real budget of the movie is only 80-100 crores. This is total fake news written 27.62.68.186 (talk) 20:51, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What sited source ? You some so called editors just believe rumours and create fake verdict.. that's not how a real editor should be ( Toddy & Flayer) I'm not ashamed of calling out your names, it's fact. These much people are talking about the budget and verdict but you guys don't give a damn . Don't behave like you have some kind of problem with Shraddha or Ranbir. There's no use of people like you who can't believe in the official things and rely on some so called sites. Let it be, because you are behaving like this is your platform. Pooja editor (talk) 21:47, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A editor called Fyrael changed the edit that was made ,a film like this cannot be made on a massive budget and it was also officially known that the movie budget was between 80-120 cr. It was also declared Super Hit. If you don't like someone that's fine but why do you do such cheap things ? Pooja editor (talk) 21:22, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pooja editor: Wikipedia's content must be determined by published information rather than editors' beliefs, experiences, or previously unpublished ideas or information. Even if you are sure something is true, it must have been previously published in a reliable source before you can add it. (See Wikipedia:Verifiability.)

The obvious source would be Pinkvilla, which has this article about it. But Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial sources#Pinkvilla says "Due to concerns centered around the reliability of box office numbers and lack of authenticity, in the 2025 RfC, there was consensus that Pinkvilla is generally unreliable."

Anyway, you need to find reliable sources that say whether it was a super hit or a flop. They need to be cited against text based on them. -- Toddy1 (talk) 21:35, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't believe them why don't you ask directly to the officials ? Why don't you check Box office news ? Why not about the real official page of the production house and all ? . Many of us know that this movie actual budget is not 200 , after how can a rom com br made on a high budget? It's just a matter of sense. They have even clarified that the budget of the movie is around 100 crores. This matter was also discussed on Twitter(X) by that time . Pooja editor (talk) 21:42, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The cited source for budget was boxofficeindia.com. This said: "The film has a huge budget which is by far the highest ever for a film of this genre of over 200 crore".^[3]

If you want to make edits to Wikipedia, it is your responsibility to provide citations to reliable published sources that support the information you want to add. -- Toddy1 (talk) 21:50, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second what Toddy1 has said - we have to use what reliable sources say. With films, it's rarely a good idea to use numbers from the producers as there is a vested interest in shaping perception. Wikipedia strongly prefers using independent secondary sources, and messages / interviews from producers are WP:PRIMARY sources.

There is a bit of a conflict on this on with BH saying the world-wide gross is ₹220. The Hindustan Times source for this being a failure has a gross of ₹139, which is close to what BH has as the India-only box office nett of 149. That source never calls the film a failure, just that it can't be called a commercial hit. I personally would consider removing that line, and just saying that the film gross XYZ world wide against it's production budget of PDQ. If we've got sources of equal quality and weight that are giving different numbers, those should be presented as a range with the various numbers attributed to their source. Ravensfire (talk) 21:57, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As suggested by Ravensfire: I have changed the budget to a range of values with citations for each. And I have changed "It was a box office failure" to "It drew audiences to cinemas, but was not considered a commercial hit" which is a better representation of what the cited source said.^[4] -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:47, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The cited source does not state the budget as ₹165 crore. Charliehdb (talk) 13:42, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The cited source (Hindustan Times) has the budget in the bar chart labelled "Bollywood's First Quarter Report" - the key says that the blue bars are "Budget (in crores)", and the blue bar for Tu Jhoothi Main Makkaar has 165 above it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:26, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dagnabit! I was just saying something like that! If you look up, the budget has caused about half of the discussions here. Ravensfire (talk) 15:30, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I tried adding a budget section to another Indian film article.^[5] As usual there were varying estimates of the film's production budget, and I found a nice comment by the director explaining that the film was made on a very low budget. But another editor felt that having a budget section was worse than pork pies at a bar mitzvah, so it got deleted - after all who needs an article if you have got an infobox.^[6] The infobox was meant to be a quick summary of the article (as per MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE), but in a lot of articles editors work on the basis that the infobox is the only thing that matters. -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:24, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]