Talk:Rika Hayashi

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 21:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace by Miraclepine (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 78 past nominations.

ミラP@Miraclepine 02:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article was moved into mainspace within the first 7 days of nomination. Article has more than 1,500 characters in prose. Article is properly sourced. Earwig picked up an unlikely copyright violation of 2.9%, as most of the article's sources are in Japanese. Any similarities picked up are titles of shows Hayashi was in. A QPQ is done. The hook is interesting and sourced. Currently, the article takes on a promotional tone as it talks in depth about how she did not know what Tonbo! was but later read to the latest chapter, which isn't something notable to list as part of career. In addition, her hobbies seem to be promotional and are not notable. lullabying (talk) 04:11, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lullabying: Just noting that I have acknowledged the issue. I am currently busy on family vacation and can't immediately reach my laptop atm, so I can't reply until tomorrow at the least (and even then I’m not really sure when—afternoon or evening?), but I’ll try to address the issue at my best convenience. ミラP@Miraclepine 01:38, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Lullabying: And I'm back. Well, I'm pretty sure the "didn't know about Tonbo" part would fit in the work's production page, but yeah I've removed it and the other just to be safe. ミラP@Miraclepine 16:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Good to go. lullabying (talk) 07:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]