This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Asia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Business High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. China Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Globalization High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. International development Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. International relations High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Trade High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. 2010s This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 180 days are automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

Is there anyone who is able to update the map on members of the BRI to reflect recent developments such as Italy exiting the initiative? Ker3243 (talk) 15:17, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding the topic of Estonia allegedly leaving BRI. If the source if accurate, and estonia did leave BRI, then the map should also reflect that. I'm not sure if the sources mentioned for Philippines leaving BRI are accurate however Ker3243 (talk) 16:01, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good point that the map used here is inaccurate as Estonia and the Philippines are not BRI members. - Amigao (talk) 16:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so Philippines may have dropped out but the sources should be replaced. Here is a link from DW news which clearly states that Phillipines exited BRI. Another from Newsweek and Asia times

https://www.dw.com/en/philippines-drops-chinas-belt-and-road-as-tensions-flare/a-67344929

https://asiatimes.com/2023/11/why-the-philippines-is-exiting-the-belt-and-road/

https://www.newsweek.com/philippines-ends-bri-initiative-1841031 Ker3243 (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Added the DW source. Thanks. - Amigao (talk) 18:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently updated the article. However, I could not find any reliable sources about the Baltics MoU, I heard the Estonian foreign minister didn't renew it but clarification is needed for other countries.

As far as I know, the BRI in the Philipines is just dead de facto, but the MoU hasn't yet expired. Auguste76840 (talk) 17:58, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please add to ecology section about this years collapse of the BRI Kafue River Dam and poisoning of the Zambian Water. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2025-35151-75 (talk) 23:20, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to suggest adding a peer-reviewed academic source that empirically examines the relationship between macroeconomic policy frameworks and inclusive economic growth outcomes in Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries.

The study uses cross-country data and contributes evidence relevant to discussions on development impacts and policy effectiveness:

Bashir, R., Arshad, T., & Sheikh, M. R. (2025). "Macroeconomic Policies and Inclusive Economic Growth in BRI Countries." Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review.

This source may be relevant for sections discussing economic outcomes, development impacts, or academic evaluations of the BRI. Bohan1222 (talk) 04:48, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]