Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mubi (streaming service), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Demi Moore, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to UIP-DunaFilm. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Academy Award for Best International Feature Film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Academy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dead Snow 2: Red vs. Dead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PepGuardi! Your additions to The Alchemist (novel) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:50, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PepGuardi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:UIP-DunaFilm, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:09, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PepGuardi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "UIP-DunaFilm".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the Talk page and discuss before changing the genre. Talk:One_Battle_After_Another#Genre_in_lead

Please also note WP:FILMGENRE. -- 109.79.163.110 (talk) 22:14, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please, @PepGuardi, stop with your awards season narratives, now at Kleber Mendonça Filho's article. Feel free to add the political persecution at the career section, but with reliable sources. You're not helping anyone creating a mess in The Secret Agent related pages. Martineden83 (talk) 20:17, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Political discussions are usually not featured in the introduction. Martineden83 (talk) 17:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not opposing to the removal of Political discussions from introduction. On this matter I think you are right. It simply because you simply removed almost everything I contributed. Kleber page was really poor and had very few relevant information. Writing takes my personalç lesure time, so it looks disrespectful simply removing information and sources that I spent a lot of of time resaerching. It is not like I came here for disrupt the article, and you did not not nice words. And more importantly I had NO IDEA you were Martinelli, who is helping me to take care of The Secret Agent page, I only realised that when I posted the warning on your talk page. I did not even know we could change our username Martineden83 . PepGuardi (talk) 18:29, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@PepGuardi, Awards section created, but first: take a look at Trier page. Only relevant awards can be added in personal pages. So do not put there all awards Kleber Mendonça Filho has listed at IMDB or any other place.

Minor awards generally are used only in the film page. Martineden83 (talk) 20:38, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for create the section. But what do you mean by “take a look at Trier page. Only relevant awards can be added”? KMF is not an European or Nordic, hence he cannot win European awards like Trier. Brazilian films are not eligible for the European Awards, but they are eligible for continental South American and Latin American awards. Brazilians Films cannot be nominated for the Danish Film Academy Robert Award, but they can nominated nominated for the Brazilian Film Academy awards. While Trier has listed awards in Finland film festivals, which is only of regional relevance, Kleber movies have awards in festivals like Lima and Gramado, which are equally regionally relevant. Just mentioned this because all those European awards and festivals awards are listed in Trier awards table, but I noticed that the section you created for TSA awards you didn’t include any Brazil or South American film festivals awards. Hopefully this is not you suggesting that awards outside the USA and Europe are not relevant, this would be pretty crazy to say in a place like Wikipedia. I hope you just don’t added them because you don’t know Brazilian and a South American/Latin American award and festivals. I guess this is why I’m Wikipedia rules there’s nothing about “only relevant awards are allowed”, we don’t want live in a European where relevancy are limited to Europe and North America.

But I believe you only added awards that you had to add, and that’s not a statement about the only awards in KMF career that you consider relevant (specially considering which awards are listed on Trier award section). Anyways, I don’t have time to add more awards this weekend, I’m only doing this next week. PepGuardi (talk) 22:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you just calm down for once? Lima and Rio are mid-range festivals, i guess. I was talking about small sized fests. You really need to read the room before jumping into conclusions. @PepGuardi

Anyway, i only added big festivals because they have many sources. You will need reliable sources for anything else. Martineden83 (talk) 23:47, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jamie Eilat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to IndieWire have been undone because they appeared to be promotional, and because you didn't provide any reliable sources. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. It's also important that article content be verifiable through the use of citations. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. — Jamie Eilat (talk) 18:24, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Martineden83 (talk) 16:14, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your litterally edit warring my friend, and all my contribution are far away from vandalist. And you are just doing this after you having broken the three revertion rule. And I gave you more than one chance to keep a friendly conversation. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMartineden83&diff=1325676089&oldid=1325673357 PepGuardi (talk) 16:19, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The three reversion rule is not applied when you violate a guideline, MOS:FILMACCOLADES, numerous times. Martineden83 (talk) 16:21, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not violate it. PepGuardi (talk) 16:22, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are refusing to read the article: WP:MOSFILM

• MOS:FILMLEAD: "Summarize awards and achievements using proper context in a later paragraph, and avoid descriptive phrases like "award-winning""
• MOS:FILMACCOLADES: "Accolades that a film receives can be covered in their own section. This may include award nominations and wins, recognition from film critics' circles, and qualifying in a list of critically acclaimed films (e.g., AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies)."
• MOS:NOTLEDE: "Wikipedia lead sections are not written in news style."

Martineden83 (talk) 16:32, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now look at the changes I made: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Secret_Agent_%282025_film%29&diff=1325671627&oldid=1325671236

where is the vandalism?! Where are the broken rules? Do you think it’s fair those accusations just because I was insisting in that edit? I reported the edit war because I thought you’d stop and discuss with me. I never even could image you’d go that far, honestly.

if when you disagree with me what you think should always prevail, just tell me and I will not edit this article anymore. It’s tiring I’m not getting payed for that and I feel like I was hitting a wall. It’s like we can never disagree, you opinion have always to prevail. But the worst part is you being unfair with me, it’s impossible that you really believe I’m a troll or someone acting on bad faith to damage this article. This whole caos is simple based on where the information should be. You def let me down, you accused me of “narrative” like that other guy that was clearly to avoid us to list the movie awards. Few weeks later you did the same. And it’s not even because you disagree with the info it’s just you didn’t want it in intro. PepGuardi (talk) 16:53, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Trifecta (awards season) when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:41, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heu @Zackmann08 Thank you very much for fixing it. I’ll take a look at what I did wrong. Best, ~2025-39739-92 (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Trifecta (awards season) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources at all.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:48, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Zackmann08 thank you for the headsup. I just edited the article and added several sources. Hope you like it and it can be enough. All the best, PepGuardi (talk) 01:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]