Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Ferrer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brachy08 _(Talk) 03:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Des-vm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Brachy08 (Talk) 03:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brachy08! thank you for your message. I will edit now, I think I know what is the problem, otherwise I will post the question. Des-vm (talk) 07:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would give you some advice for the article, search up more about her... I can see that you added a new source, which is a primary source, which wouldn’t help. You should also compare your article to other BLPs (biographies of living persons) on Wikipedia, for some help. Brachy08 _(Talk) 07:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your replay. I added new sources. I hope is better now. Thanks for your help. Des-vm (talk) 10:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It needs a bit more work (in sources, that is). Brachy08 _(Talk) 13:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed some external links in the body, because I was not sure if that was a problem and I added a external links section. Do you think this is right? thanks again for your help. Des-vm (talk) 13:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JBW was:

This draft reads like a personal evaluation of Sara Ferrer and her work. A Wikipedia article needs to be written from a neutral point of view, and should not express any opinions or judgements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Ferrer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JBW (talk) 22:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JBW,

thanks for your review. I have corrected some texts that could be considered opinions or judgments. If there is anything else that can be corrected, I would be very grateful if you could tell me where in the article there may be phrases that are misunderstood. Thank you so much. Des-vm (talk) 08:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs a bit more significant coverage. See WP:Notability (people)#Creative professionals

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Ferrer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brachy08 _(Talk) 12:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sara Ferrer. Thanks! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 09:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Could you please be more specific?

Thank you. Des-vm (talk) 09:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Ferrer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Des-vm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sara Ferrer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:24, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]