The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Research Society of International Law (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was clearly written by the organisation (and they were so unbiased that they had to mention so themselves!). All sources given are self-published. Searching reveals a handful of secondary sources mentioning the group, but none of them go beyond passing. — Anonymous 14:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Organizations, Politics, and Pakistan. — Anonymous 14:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Sourced 100% to the organization itself, and nothing else could be found except social media posts and routine listings in directories. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Being this is an organization, it falls under WP:NCORP. I find a lot of mentions about the subject and it is quoted in references, but I am unable to find anything meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. Unless there are references that focus on the topic in-depth, it would not meet notability guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seems to be WP:Promo, as it seems to be sourced and possibly written by the company itself. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:37, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.