The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus that the subject passes WP:NPOL. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Puteri Anetta Komarudin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Puteri Anetta Komarudin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NPOL, Notability is assumed when either of two criterion from NPOL is satisfied, subject of article is leaning on #1 of NPOL but a before search shows she lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Even the two sources used in the article are shaky, this isn’t a reliable source & the second being this source is not even about her. GNG is definitely not satisfied here. Lastly, notability is not inherited, her father is a notable politician but it doesn’t translate to her being auto notable via proximity. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@AleatoryPonderings, Sorry for the late response. Now that was what was hard about nominating this for deletion. People are presumed notable if they satisfy either of the two criterion from NPOL but the keyword here is presumed notable & not are notable so I carried out a before search thinking I’d see an abundance of RS seeing as she has accomplished a milestone (you know, the typical type of first x to do/be y) type of sources discussing her but to my surprise this isn’t the case, she’s never really discussed in detail & most of the sources discussing her always include her father. optimizing the google translate would also confirm this to you. NPOL merely points to WP:GNG & in itself isn’t an SNG. Celestina007 (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. She’s a newly elected representative so may not have attracted much media attention yet. Unless someone thinks she isn’t actually a member of the PRC, she’s default notable. Mccapra (talk) 18:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mccapra like I stated above, NPOL points to GNG, per WP:NPOL people are presumed notable & not automatically notable if they satisfy either of two criterion in NPOL. So one can satisfy criterion #1 for example but still not be notable enough for a standalone article on them. Like you said she hasn’t attracted media coverage just yet. Wouldn’t this then be an archetype WP:TOOSOON scenario? Celestina007 (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Puteri_Anetta_Komarudin
No tags for this post.