The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Britt Bowman (photographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

being in a relationship with a famous person does not equate to notability, nor does working for a band if there is no coverage of the subjects own work or subject directly. Bowman has no independent coverage and fails GNG and Ncreative etc... Praxidicae (talk) 15:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable photographer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Does not pass notability criteria for WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST]]. After searching I could find nothing on this photographer other than social media. Netherzone (talk) 03:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.