Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:B'nai B'rith Girls and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 19:22, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goldisametal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 19:22, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much I will check it out immediately Goldisametal (talk) 19:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I need help understanding why my Draft, B'nai B'rith Girls was rejected. I know I need more reference, but was it the amount of references, or do I need to also add more variety in where they come from? Goldisametal (talk) 19:47, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should ask Bonadea, the editor who reviewed your draft.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:53, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Bonadea: You have recently rejected this page; I am new to making pages, so I want to know what was missing from the page. If you have the time, could you please give me some advice? Also, I'm reposting this on my talk page since I am unsure of how visible they are. So, I don't know if you can see it. Goldisametal (talk) 20:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has not been rejected (which would mean that you couldn't resubmit it), merely declined, giving you the option to edit, revise, and resubmit it. Creating a new article is pretty much the hardest thing you can do at Wikipedia; my advice would be for you to spend some weeks or months editing existing articles before attempting to create a new one (and the draft won't disappear – drafts are usually deleted only after six months of no edits.) That being said, the main problem with the draft you created is that it is entirely based on the organisation itself – all the sources are the org's own website or websites affiliated with it. Wikipedia is almost completely uninterested in what an organisation says about itself. Please take a bit of time to read the decline notice above, and follow the links to the key terms "in-depth", "reliable", "secondary", and "strictly independent". Unless the draft is almost completely based on information supported by that kind of source, it is unlikely to be accepted. And any information that cannot be verified by a reliable source needs to be removed from the draft. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 21:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]