Archive 75←Archive 80Archive 81Archive 82Archive 83Archive 84Archive 85

Wikidata weekly summary #511

Wikidata weekly summary #512

April Editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wikidata weekly summary #513

Wikidata weekly summary #514

Thanks

Joiner of dots
Thank you for this great activity that you seem to be an expert at in joining up articles, therefore making Wikipedia connected. I really appreciate it. Here's the handmade joiner of dots award. CT55555 (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moataz Abdel-Fattah (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft may potentially meet the relevant requirements (WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO) but presently does not. As other reviewers have noted, to meet Wikipedia's basic requirement of being notable requires evidence (citations) from reliable sources-- please see referencing for beginners. Additionally, the draft reads like a CV, which Wikipedia is not. Please familiarise yourself with theses pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements then resubmit the page and ping me and I would be happy to reassess.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moataz Abdel-Fattah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Moataz Abdel-Fattah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Cabrils (talk) 06:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dsp13! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 06:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dsp13/Archive_82
No tags for this post.