Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Draft:Cis person

In response to your comment at Talk:Cisgender, I began the exercise of imagining what an article about the concept of being cisgender would look like. It seemed in poor taste to share the joke there, so I hope it's welcome and amusing here.

A cisgender person is someone who feels that their gender identity aligns with the sex they were assigned at birth. Many cisgender (or cis) people report experiencing gender congruence, a mental condition which causes them clinically significant distress when they imagine themself or anyone having sexual characteristics or gender presentation different from those they were assigned at birth. The causes of this are not yet fully understood. Many cis people insist on using a same-sex "given name" name instead of the chosen name which non-cis people typically adopt during their second puberty. Cis people frequently insist on wearing same-sex clothes, and fulfilling gender roles (such as the dominant breadwinner and the submissive housewife) which they call "traditional". This can be confusing or surprising for their non-cis peers—it is important to understand that these "traditional" roles are not typically sexual. The antonym of cisgender is transgender, although this term is criticized and rejected by many non-cis people who prefer to be called "normal".

RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (talk • stalk) 14:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. It's not even an unreasonable way of looking at it, just an unfamiliar one which many people would not feel comfortable engaging with. DanielRigal (talk) 18:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adult human female

Can you explain why you deleted my comment on the adult human female page and labeled as trolling? The assertion that trans women are men is widely accepted by many scientists, feminists and now by the US government. If you don’t agree, that’s fine, censoring it is absolutely unacceptable. Jorgebox4 (talk) 13:18, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, come on. You know that you can't post stuff like that. Just consider yourself lucky that you didn't get a warning template and move on. DanielRigal (talk) 15:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We are a private charity. We are allowed to censor. Bearian (talk) 02:00, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HnH

Hi, I was thinking of another page, not HnH. I'm not really interested in HnH.--Flexdream (talk) 17:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Hello, DanielRigal. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Bishonen | tålk 18:21, 8 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

I'll wait and see if they return to causing disruption elsewhere. They've had their warning. They don't have to like it. They just have to heed it. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Now indeffed by Doug Weller. Bishonen | tålk 00:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Proposal for a transgender filter

Hi again, Daniel. I thought you might be interested in this idea,and perhaps be able to supply some of the diffs they're asking for there. Bishonen | tålk 09:50, 10 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

A beer for you!

Thanks for helping out in dealing with that IP - wikipedia needs more people like you. Cheers! :) CR (talk) 22:22, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No tags for this post.