Article photo consensus

I want a vote & consensus on the photo for the article. While the Option A is official, and higher resolution, I believe, with the image being nearly 8 years old, as well as the changes in the look of Sullivan's appearance, especially with his hair going white, that the portrait no longer accurately represents Sullivan, thus I wish to replace it with Option B, which I believe would be better, especially for the purpose of an encyclopaedia. I also believe that a later photo is better for a sitting, serving Senator.

Mycranthebigman of Alaska ^_^ 02:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Official vote for Option B. Mycranthebigman of Alaska ^_^ 02:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change consensus; image vote

I want a vote & consensus on the photo for the article. While the Option A is official, and higher resolution, I believe, with the image being nearly 8 years old, as well as the changes in the look of Sullivan's appearance, especially with his hair going white, that the portrait no longer accurately represents Sullivan, thus I wish to replace it with one of the following options, B, C or D, which I believe would be better, especially for the purpose of an encyclopaedia. I also believe that a later photo is better for a sitting, serving Senator.

Mycranthebigman of Alaska ^_^ 21:27, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Official vote for Option D. Mycranthebigman of Alaska ^_^ 21:51, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Personally prefer keeping Option A, aside from the hair going white, it doesn't look too different. I probably wouldn't have noticed if it hadn't been pointed out. Option D as a close second because B looks oddly stretched towards the right. SuperWIKI (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I support Option A, it looks more professional than the other three portraits. Furthermore, it is of higher quality than the other three. RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 20:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I motion to close the vote in favor of Option A ~ AlaskaGALT (talk) 13:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I second the motion. SuperWIKI (talk) 13:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I third the motion as it proves to be the best looking image of all 4 images HistorianL (talk) 15:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 February 2025

Dan Sullivan (U.S. senator)Dan SullivanWP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Pageviews Analysis [1] shows that this article has the highest traffic out of all the Dan Sullivans available. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:50, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the second proposal, Dan SullivanDan Sullivan (disambiguation), was removed from this request, because Dan Sullivan is a redirect. Redirects are ineligible to be current titles in move requests. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 20:24, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Again? Given the number of page moves over the years, combined with the fact that it was at a naturally-disambiguated title to begin with, and I'm stunned that this isn't in a move-warring hall of fame already. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 13:34, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I think the title was useful when the Anchorage mayor was prominent, but it's not really essential now. It is pretty likely this Dan Sullivan will be a senator for around 20 years, given he will probably be re-elected next year. I'm not sure what the above comment is referring to, I went looking and I never saw an argument made that this page is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC before now. --Quiz shows 19:36, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No tags for this post.