15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

--Spencer^T♦C 15:10, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the help, Meno! I'm going through the subcategories and I'm having trouble trying to figure out how to write the Arabic for the following:

• Commons:Category:Elementary schools in Manhattan
• Commons:Category:Elementary schools in the Bronx
• Commons:Category:Middle schools in Manhattan
• Commons:Category:High schools in Manhattan

If I have the Arabic for these I can cover these subcategories too. Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

@WhisperToMe: You're welcome.

• Elementary schools in Manhattan=مدارس ابتدائية في مانهاتن
• Elementary schools in the Bronx=مدارس ابتدائية في ذا برونكس
• Middle schools in Manhattan=مدارس إعداداية في مانهاتن
• High schools in Manhattan=مدارس ثانوية في مانهاتن

--Meno25 (talk) 06:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! I've added Arabic to the respective categories on the Commons WhisperToMe (talk) 12:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Please visit T99471. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:50, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

@Magioladitis: I am afraid that I don't understand the comment by @Rjwilmsi:. What is this "typo comment"? Could you give me, please, step by step instructions on what to do? --Meno25 (talk) 14:26, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

If you check ar:Project:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage you ll see a typo comment in the code. Copy it to pther other projects you want them to use the Arabic typo fixing. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for doing CheckWiki fixes today. Magioladitis is on vacation (he better not check Wikipedia) and I really needed the help. Thank you very much. Bgwhite (talk) 07:58, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Bgwhite I am around, watching everything. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:59, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Magioladitis You are supposed to be having fun in Turkey. Atleast one of us needs to have fun. Go away. Bgwhite (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Bgwhite You're welcome. Thank you for your message. --Meno25 (talk) 08:21, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Meno25;

Thank you very much indeed for your quick review of Liu Liangmo, though I am a little discouraged with the “Start” rating. I can see that you did heroic work in reviewing dozens and dozens of articles over that last week or so but I’m not sure how “Assist” works and whether it does the rating or you do.

As you know, the Start criteria read:

An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources.... The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent. ... Frequently, the referencing is inadequate....”

To get a feel for the criteria applied, I looked at a few articles chosen at random. Dermott Downs and Joe Dermody, are rated Start, but they sure look like Stubs, so I assume the criteria are flexible. I looked at a few articles which were rated C and B, and they certainly look worthy, but not necessarily better sourced than some of the Start rated articles.

So maybe you could help me to improve next time by pointing out where the content of the Liu Liangmo article is “quite incomplete,” where the sources are incomplete, in which of the “many areas” it is weak, or the “quality of prose” unencyclopedic. I’m sure that there is no reason to say that the MoS compliance is “non-existent.”

Again, I thank you for the hard work, and am grateful for the opportunity to look at the list of the articles you rated just on July 23 and 25. It was astounding and educational to see the number of new articles and the range of topics. I had no idea!

All the best. ch (talk) 22:11, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

@CWH: Thank you for your kind words. Much appreciated. As you already know, the WikiProject assessment criteria is not set in stone. This is especially true for ratings whose criteria are nearly similar to each other such as: Stub and Start ratings, Start and C ratings, etc. There are some edge cases where I am personally puzzled about which rating that I should assign to the article. However, I will not deny it: given the fact that I did thousands of WikiProject ratings in the past few weeks, it is quite possible that I did some mistakes along the way. After reconsidering the article in question, I now believe that it should be assigned C rating, especially after you expanded it yesterday. Also, please note that I am not an expert on the subject of this article. If you would like the article to be reviewed, I recommend that you leave a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Science and academia where an expert may voice his opinion. Thank you. --Meno25 (talk) 07:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Many more thanks for your (again) quick response, which is not merely a "reply" but an actual "response." It is the work of people like you that makes Wikipedia possible, and the thoughtfulness that makes it valuable.ch (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

• I saw your quality assessment rating of William H. Warner article. I thought I covered his life pretty well with good sources. What is missing from the article, I’d like to get it up to a "C" or "B" level?--Orygun (talk) 18:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

@Orygun: I reassessed the article as C class. I can't assign it B class because this requires a formal review by WikiProject Military history. Best wishes. --Meno25 (talk) 05:20, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

14:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)