The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:29, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Obinna Richfield-Anah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Résumé-like WP:BLP of a "knowledge management expert", not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria.
As always, people are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they have jobs, and have to show evidence of passing WP:GNG on third-party reliable source coverage about them and their work to establish its significance -- but this is referenced to a podcast interview in which he's doing the speaking (a primary source that does not constitute support for notability at all) and a single piece in a digital news platform of at best questionable reliability or GNG-worthiness given the longstanding WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA problem with checkbook journalism.
It takes a lot more than just two weak sources to make a person notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Nigeria. Bearcat (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Simply fails WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Nothing such as credible claim of significance here. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:19, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is a work in progress, primary sources will be added to enrich it Olabisi11 (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This looks like a WP:BROCHURE to me. No evidence of notability, I was unable to find anything resembling significant independent coverage. MediaKyle (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. notability not remotely found. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:43, 14 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]
• Comment: The two sources are not from Nigeria, so, I’ll make my search now to see if anything comes up. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 07:36, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I see interviews and press releases where he said some things. No source was found to be GNG-worthy. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 07:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Couldn't agree more with nominator. Fails GNG. Gauravs 51 (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: fails WP:GNG Ibjaja055 (talk) 13:43, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG. Gedaali (talk) 08:17, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.