This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Ohio Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance). U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Smith v. Spisak → Frank Spisak Jr.Frank Spisak Jr. – Not all supreme court decisions are notable, and this one does not appear to be. Spisak, however, is notable as a serial murderer and terrorist. [1][2] [3], among others. Even if the case is notable Spisak as a person is the more notable topic. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Split. The person is notable. While there are indeed non-notable U.S. Supreme Court decisions, I do not believe this is one of them. It is cited in dozens of other cases, and in several books on capital punishment. BD2412 T 03:17, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Also fine by me. I just searched it from the book and was very surprised that this is how we were covering it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:37, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split. Definitely notable. Definitely could have an article on him separately. lethargilistic (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'm just going to withdraw this an make him a separate article. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]