Home

Barnstars, Badges, & User Boxes

Talk to me

Creations

Archives

Archive 1, 2005-2006 Archive 2, 2007 Archive 3, 2008 Archive 4, 2009 Archive 5, 2010 Archive 6, 2011 Archive 7, 2012 Archive 8, 2013 Archive 9, 2014 Archive 10, 2015 Archive 11, 2016 Archive 12, 2017 Archive 13, 2018 Archive 14, 2019 Archive 15, 2020 Archive 16, 2021 Archive 17, 2022 Archive 18, 2023 Archive 19, 2024

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On your creations page, it says that an article was deleted. It is currently blue-linked. Is that your article? Alexeyperlov 17:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're referring to Yanet García, it looks like it was re-created by another editor. To confirm, open this link and scroll down to line 559. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Editors (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Editors (novel) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hello, Bri. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Home grow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manual publishing is always a pain in the ass -- thank you for getting it out. jp×g🗯️ 10:14, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JPxG Yes, it's a dreary copy-paste fest! Here's hoping whatever's wrong with the script is simple to correct. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Wikipedia Day Saturday afternoon, January 11, from 1:00–4:30pm PT at the Capitol Hill Meeting Room at Capitol Hill Branch Library (425 Harvard Ave. E., Seattle, WA 98102) Wikipedia Day celebrates the anniversary of the founding of Wikipedia. This year we will observe Wikipedia Day with an edit-a-thon to improve the Seattle and other articles important to WikiProject Seattle, such as History of Seattle, Puget Sound, Lake Union, Lake Washington, Pioneer Square, Seattle Center, Tacoma, and University of Washington. →Sign up at Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle/Wikipedia Day 2025!← You can also read and add to the task list. Please remember to check our Seattle meetup schedule each month for upcoming events.

Honda Super Cub has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bri! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Seeking wisdom: streamlining navboxes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bri,

For some recently tagged articles, you somehow merged BLPPROD tags with PROD tags. These are two very different forms of deletion and the current merger is confusing for a reviewer to assess. It would have been simpler if they had all just been regular PROD taggings. And, for example, the tags don't include the username of the tagger as is typical.

So I'm going to leave them for another admin to try to sort out. If, in the future, you could just choose one form of PROD, either an BLPPROD tag or a regular PROD tag, it would be much more straight-forward for the admin who needs to evaluate them. Just use Twinkle to select one form of PROD instead of creating original forms of tagging. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Sorry for the trouble. I don't use Twinkle, I just place the templates by hand and manually log at User:Bri/PROD. Thought that it was a good idea to use BLPPROD where it seems justified. I.e. applying BLPPROD only where no references exist, per the documentation. Some BLPs don't satisfy this requirement, so I use PROD instead.

Based on your description above of "merged" I'm not sure what is wrong; if you could provide a diff maybe I would understand better. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 in Washington (state), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:08, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]