Archives

Archive 1  (May 06 – Jul 07) Archive 2  (Aug 07 – Oct 07) Archive 3  (Nov 07 – Dec 07) Archive 4  (Jan 08 – Mar 08) Archive 5  (Apr 08 – May 08) Archive 6  (Jun 08 – Aug 08) Archive 7  (Sep 08 – Oct 08) Archive 8  (Nov 08 – Jan 09) Archive 9  (Feb 09 – Mar 09) Archive 10 (Apr 09 – Jun 09) Archive 11 (Jul 09 – Aug 09) Archive 12 (Sep 09 – Nov 09) Archive 13 (Dec 09 – Apr 10) Archive 14 (May 10 – Aug 10) Archive 15 (Sep 10 – Jan 11) Archive 16 (Feb 11 – Jun 11) Archive 17 (Jul 11 – Dec 13) Archive 18 (Jul 14 – Nov 23) Archive Images (Image notices)

I'm thinking of running Space Invaders at TFA on January 26; does that work for you? This was one of your featured article nominations, years ago. - Dank (push to talk) 02:15, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry for not responding sooner. I rarely come on here anymore since I retired from editing. Regarding having Space Invaders as the TFA, I'm not sure whether its the best idea because I've noticed the quality fluctuate over the years. Right now, it seems it's been cleaned up some, but it still has some issues: excess quoting, single sentence paragraphs, some layout changes might help, etc.)

That being said, however... As I am retired, I'll defer to VG Project members. They've always done a great job protecting TFAs and keeping up with articles. Thanks for reaching out and for considering Space Invaders for TFA. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 16:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you today for the article, introduced (in 2008): "This is one of the VG Project's Top priority articles. Since this year is its 30th anniversary, I figured it deserved a proper article."! - Thanks for commenting now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I know you know what you're doing, that one threw me for a loop on P.N.03: shouldn't that be in both the body and the infobox? Always figured information in there should generally be covered in the body too. Just asking in case I tackle a game article again anytime soon. Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll defer to you as I'm not really active and am not familiar with current editing standards. It was an awkward orphan sentence that I wasn't sure what to do with. My first instinct was to move into the second paragraph. But I wasn't sure how to reword it, so I took the most simple course of action. Happy to hear alternatives from someone with better experience. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 00:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC))[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WS-WiiRemote Example.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 22:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been so long. How are you doing? I've been editing several articles and now I'm busy with both Kiruko and the KOF article you edited. Thanks. A fellow user also started making FA Resident Evil characters which sure is impressive but I'll just try with GA since I'm not English native. I tried making an article for Soma Cruz from Castlevania but it was sadly merged. Any news about your edits? Merry Christmas. Tintor2 (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good to run into you again. Congratulations on your continued efforts to improve content. Keep up the good work. I'm still retired, so I don't have any real goals or plans. I've been lurking around here and there doing minor edits to help where I can. Merry Christmas to you too. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 05:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Crash Bandicoot (character) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kamen Rider Ryuki - Title Screen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Guyver-Volume1-VHS-Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on Ryo Sakazaki to see if it can become GA after toning down the reception to the most notable parts and balancing real world info with inuniverse. I requested a copyedit but they say it's mostly fine and Kazama also revised it. Could you give the prose a look? It's my biggest weak point.Tintor2 (talk) 18:24, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'll try to take a look next week. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 20:14, 22 February 2025 (UTC))[reply]

@Tintor2: I've read the article and have ideas. Some are simple grammar fixes/rewordings and the rest are questions about the content to better understand the original meaning. How do you want the feedback? I can make the simple fixes to the article unless you'd like a full breakdown like a peer review. If I just make the edits, do you prefer explicit comments for each edit (easier to track and revert) or is consolidating them in single edits ok?. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 14:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC))[reply]

What you find easier to do. A peer review would take some pointless time from you so consolidating them might seem better. Thanks Tintor2 (talk) 14:56, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]