Hello, Chance997! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:23, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your disruptive behavior, whatever its intentions, is likely to result in sanctions against your account. Blanking your talk page does not hide your previous actions; we can all see the page history and it will be relevant to us if this pattern of behavior continues. Please heed the warnings that have been repeatedly brought to you. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would add to this that requesting your earlier draft to be deleted, before straight away recreating it, does not 'reset the clock' in any sense. A record of your edits and draft creations/deletions/etc. remains in the log, and even deleted pages can be seen by administrators. Your behaviour is rapidly getting into the areas of tendentious editing and gaming the system, neither of which is helpful, and I must warn you you're closer to being sanctioned than you probably realise. Please stop this now. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop wasting people's time, or you will be blocked. Cullen328 (talk) 07:57, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are already on a final warning. Have they already violated it? Sergecross73 msg me 14:43, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All right. Chance997 (talk) 14:49, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say whether or not Chance has crossed the line is up to you. They have definitely pushed the limits of my patience though. silviaASH (inquire within) 17:35, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about you guys, but I had to explain to Chance that an hour is the same as 60 minutes in this discussion: Draft talk:The Flash (1990 film)#Notability?. (The draft, like a few of their other ones, is a WP:CONTENTFORK.) Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:47, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The likelihood that Chance is a minor seems fairly strong to me. Obviously whether or not that is true is none of our business and they are not required to tell us that (and if this is so, then I hope all the identifying personal information they've posted on their userpage(s) is mostly or entirely fictitious, for their own sake), but we should nonetheless keep that possibility in mind and be patient with them, even if it is a little bit annoying.

Chance, if you are in fact under 18, I recommend you read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. silviaASH (inquire within) 05:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Men in Black: International. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. The text you copied to that page in this edit came from the contributions of another editor on Men in Black: International (score). Copying text from other Wikipedia articles is not against policy, but if you copy text from other Wikipedia articles or other freely licensed sources such as Fandom wikis, please acknowledge the source of this text in the edit summary. Also, please make sure that whatever you copy is in fact freely licensed, so as to avoid copyright violations. silviaASH (inquire within) 20:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All right. I'll look it up, but thanks for the heads up. Chance997 (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding cast sections to the Rings of Power episode articles. I have explained why this should not be done, continuing to do it is disruptive. - adamstom97 (talk) 17:16, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Superman: The Last Son of Krypton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:57, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]