User talk:Salvidrim!

 Archives

 2011 - Q3–Q4
 2012 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 
 2013 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 
 2014 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 
 2015 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 
 2016 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 
 2017 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 
 2018 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 
 2019 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 
 2020 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4 
 2021 - Q1 · Q2 · Q3–Q4
 2022 - Q1–Q4
 2023 - Q1–Q4
 2024 - Q1–Q4
 2025 - Q1–Q4
 2026 - Q1–Q4


Intentionally not archived older threads

File:Owen Breckon is good

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7C:7011:A300:2470:82C2:C90:FE1B (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paralympic project

Since you are bilingual, I was wondering if you would be interested in translating a couple of small articles in French for me? Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Game hint lines

I came across an article in GamePro about live game counselors and 900 hint lines which has one or two useful pieces of info. The trouble is, I can't seem to find an article on Wikipedia where such information might appropriately go. Any suggestions?--Martin IIIa (talk) 20:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's probably enough coverage to convert Nintendo Power Line into a broader concept of Video Game hint lines, of which the most famous was the Nintendo Power Line: Kotaku, A.V. Club, the line was revived for the NES Mini launch (Engadget, CNet, Polygon), Wikia (unusable as a source but can be used as a base for research), featured in The Wizard, that time when one number was bought by an sex company (N4G, NBC, Wired), Gamasutra, Felicia Day biography, Geek.com, Sierra Hint Line (this is an archive of 1989 Sierra Magazine), Sega, Konami also had their own Hint Lines.  · Salvidrim! ·  20:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Martin IIIa do you have a link to the GamePro article?  · Salvidrim! ·  13:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bumping thread for 60 days.  · Salvidrim! ·  16:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agh, sorry it took me so unbelievably long to notice this post! To add insult to injury, no, I don't have a link, just a physical copy of the issue. It's issue 92, cover-dated May 1996, and the articles is on pages 14-15, if that helps at all.--Martin IIIa (talk) 15:48, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ans you wouldn't happen to have a scan? ;D Ben—Salvidrim!  04:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[1] —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 20:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from WT:VG
 – Ben · Salvidrim!  01:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Still something I'm interested in working on. Ben · Salvidrim!  01:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]




Evil Stone moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Evil Stone, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EvilStoneOpening.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EvilStoneOpening.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Concern regarding Draft:Evil Stone

Information icon Hello, Salvidrim!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Evil Stone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hi

I know you've been less active on Wikipedia lately, so I'm not sure if this will mean much to you. But I wanted you to know that I now think the Committee was overly harsh in desysopping you in 2018. If you could see yourself ever back actively and happily adminning, let me know if you'd ever want to talk about the path to becoming a sysop again. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 21:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks @L235:, I won't lie, I've been thinking about it recently! I've stayed a bit out of sight of patrolling the admin/community boards but I wouldn't consider myself inactive, I still edit here and there every week. Also, I don't necessarily think the desysopping was unwarranted, although I do miss the gnoming/clerking work I was able to so back then. I'm definitely open to returning to active duty if you think the community will support it! Ben · Salvidrim!  23:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Happy holidays

Stopping by to leave an advance holiday greeting. Good to see you're still around, even if not so much this last few months. Glad you're still finding time to edit, and all the best for the holidays and for 2026. -- Euryalus (talk) 07:15, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Euryalus:! Still around yes. Ironically I used to have more time to edit when I worked in-office, because it was easy to do from a desk. Now that I'm fully remote for years it's a lot easier to do other things. :p Ben · Salvidrim!  07:27, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).

Administrator changes

added
  • Chaotic Enby
  • Rjjiii
readded Valereee
removed
  • Fathoms Below
  • Tamzin

CheckUser changes

removed Spicy

Technical news

  • Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
  • Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958

Miscellaneous


The redirect King Evandar has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 22 § King Evandar until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 04:11, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

Hi Salvidrim!
Season's Greetings and all the best for 2026
Wherever you are and whatever you believe in (or don't), reach out for peace on this little planet of ours!
HAPPY HOLIDAYS 🥳
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:55, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Spencer Crittenden

Hello Salvidrim!, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Spencer Crittenden, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Crittenden.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JohnMizuki}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JohnMizuki (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2025).

Administrator changes

added
  • Epicgenius
  • Left guide
  • LEvalyn
  • MPGuy2824
  • The4lines
  • Yue
readded Fathoms Below
removed
  • BaronLarf
  • Firefly
  • kelapstick
  • Opabinia regalis
  • Pbsouthwood
  • Sethant
  • UtherSRG
  • Whouk

CheckUser changes

added
  • Giraffer
  • HouseBlaster
  • SilverLocust
removed
  • Liz
  • Worm That Turned
  • Z1720

Oversight changes

added
  • Asilvering
  • Giraffer
  • Girth Summit
  • Guerillero
  • HouseBlaster
  • Izno
  • SilverLocust
removed
  • Liz
  • Worm That Turned
  • Z1720

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration