Hi Czech98006! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 21:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox military conflict see here,

result – optional – this parameter may use one of two standard terms: "X victory" or "Inconclusive". The term used is for the "immediate" outcome of the "subject" conflict and should reflect what the sources say. In cases where the standard terms do not accurately describe the outcome, a link or note should be made to the section of the article where the result is discussed in detail (such as "See the Aftermath section"). Such a note can also be used in conjunction with the standard terms but should not be used to conceal an ambiguity in the "immediate" result. Do not introduce non-standard terms like "decisive", "marginal" or "tactical", or contradictory statements like "decisive tactical victory but strategic defeat". Omit this parameter altogether rather than engage in speculation about which side won or by how much.

Keith-264 (talk) 23:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Litterally battle was clear Allied victory when Germans surrendred tell me whats so indecisive about it, on every wikipedia it says it's allied victory expect for English one Czech98006 (talk) 08:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Germans were besieged and surrendered at the end of the war, not because they were attacked. Please read the guide. Keith-264 (talk) 20:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They had no other chance still Czech98006 (talk) 06:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Choice* Czech98006 (talk) 06:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Czech98006. Thank you for your work on Battle Of Orlau-Frankenau. Another editor, ARandomName123, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add page numbers to the books, and cite them inline where possible.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ARandomName123}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle Of Orlau-Frankenau. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because inline citations are required to support any claims made in an article per WP:INLINE. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FULBERT (talk) 07:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

You're citing Wikipedia, on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle Of Orlau-Frankenau and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Czech98006! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Czech98006! Your additions to Hungarian–Czechoslovak War have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#List_of_wars_involving_the_Czech_lands_discussion OrionNimrod (talk) 18:21, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars involving Poland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bohemian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the assurance given in Special:Diff/1292201778, welcome back and feel free to remove this. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:48, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Khmelnytsky Uprising) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:00, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply] Wait why my reason was justified this is mistake Czech98006 (talk) 17:13, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply] And user didnt even opened discussion Czech98006 (talk) 17:14, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply] This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Czech98006 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: User Michalsenv is editing result without any discussion and completely ignoring citations, other users can confirm that you maded mistake Decline reason: Only your actions are relevant here. You haven't addressed your edit warring. Yamla (talk) 17:32, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply] If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello! Thank you for your contributions to List of wars involving Poland, though I do want to address two things.

When it comes to the age of your sources, per WP:AGEMATTERS and WP:SOURCE, it obviously isn't great to use old sources. I figure that you've understood by this now, however I just wanna give a tip, I really don't recommend using any source before the year of about 1980 or 1990 (which is at least what I go by).

As for formatting, please don't just put in links and call it a day. If you're not allowed to instantly convert from a link to a proper citation, please take your time and fill out the "Manual" section. And always ensure that you've provided a page number, because a source may be quite tricky to fact check without it.

Thank you! Setergh (talk) 17:51, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The Red Archive (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to Edit privately just go to Sandokan as other users said there is nothing wrong with editing draft Czech98006 (talk) 16:36, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox* Czech98006 (talk) 16:36, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Czech98006. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle Of Orlau-Frankenau, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Strassnitz. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and please provide enough information in your footnotes so as to meet WP:VERIFY. To see what needs to be included in footnotes, please refer to WP:CITE.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:13, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Herzegovina uprising of 1882. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and It also needs more sourcing so as to satisfy WP:VERIFY.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:21, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1882 Hezergovina uprising, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Earth605^talk 13:21, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Czech98006. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Brezová pod Brandlom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Czech98006. Thank you for your work on Battle of Zvolen (1919). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability as per WP:NEVENT. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:56, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Czech98006. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Brezová pod Brandlom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:43, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Czech98006. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Strassnitz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]