The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Enough of a rough consensus exists towards keeping (with the rationale that the song satisfies the subsequent notability criteria). Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne sais quoi (song)

Je ne sais quoi (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are numerous articles like this referencing the Eurovision song contest, so here goes a test case. This song hasn't charted, hasn't been covered by multiple artists, and hasn't won any awards, making it fail WP:NSONGS. I don't think that solely being entered in the Eurovision Song Contest makes a song sufficiently notable to justify a standalone article. —Kww(talk) 14:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Hadn't thought of it that way, but that seems to be a pretty low standard: winning the contest to be allowed to enter a contest doesn't seem particularly different from winning any preliminary in any competition.—Kww(talk) 15:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep This, I think, is something of a special case. The bottom line is we can't adequately assess notability until the actual event happens in a couple of months. Probably the ideal situation here would be to have one big article covering all the entries, with the option to split out the winner and the others that become hits into individual articles. As it is now, notability in the immediate future is likely but uncertain, and verifiability/sourcing is no problem. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:06, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:NSONGS and keeping it as a possibly notable song later is getting into WP:CRYSTAL territory Not sure I'd call it being Iceland's entry an award, especially without knowing how many entries there were. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not notable enough for it's own article, will never be more then the really short stub it is now Alan - talk 17:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How so? Most articles of this type become much larger. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 16:49, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's far from a universal mindset. Personally, I think music oriented articles have to pass WP:N and WP:MUSIC. I'm far from alone, there. Most of the music guidelines operate as exclusion guidelines in common practice.—Kww(talk) 00:49, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. As is what happens each year, the song pages for each country are created and if given time and when an interested editor comes along, can turn into well developed articles chronicling the song's background and performance. Take Secret Combination (song) for example, there is no reason why any Eurovision song article could not get close to being similar to it. It may be a little crystal, but the song will be presented at an international song contest and will certainly gain loads of media attention as the contest approaches. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 01:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I agree with Grk1011/Stephen. The article needs time to develop after just been selected to compete in the contest, and the media attention received at the contest in May will help in its development. Sims2aholic8 (Michael) (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:NSONGS. The Eurovision Song Contest is unique in that its ‘preliminaries’ tend to be major song contests in their own right. – EdvardMunch (talk) 05:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep One of the goals of WikiProject Eurovision is "Creating a page for each contestant and song involved in the contest." Deleting this page would impede the project's goal and would undo the effort of those that contributed to it. --DannyBoy20802 (talk) 00:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • And how our experience in working with them gives us a better idea on the abundance of information that is around for them to develop into great articles. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see that a "concentration of Eurovision Project members" is something to be worried about. Such members are editors of wikipedia, and we're here to find consensus among editors. I'm not part of the Eurovision Project, but I think you're out of line there. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
People are reading me as having said something that I did not. I didn't ask for their opinions to be discarded, I just think it is a legitimate thing to keep in mind while evaluating community consensus. Any time a subset of the community is heavily weighted in a discussion, that weighting needs to be considered.—Kww(talk) 20:30, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Je_ne_sais_quoi_(song)
No tags for this post.