Other talk page banners

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: Film: Canadian / French / War This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force. This article is supported by the French cinema task force. This article is supported by the War films task force. Canada: Ontario / Cinema Low‑importance Canada portal WikiProject Canada Canada notice board This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario. This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ukraine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: War films / Russian & Soviet This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  War films task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Here is the Reception section that is recovered from previously proposed versions by talk and User:UrbanVillager and some others. I checked the sources, they are all cited here correctly. For those who want to keep the Critical Response, it can be positioned either under Reception or as a stand-alone section. So here is the text, which has all sources checked (and so should be added to the page):

Not even close to 500 edits, so I can't, but if someone who can edit wants to add the following (as of 12 Aug 2025) re: back-and-forth with TVO, feel free: "... Lawyers representing the film threatened TVO with legal action last year for pulling the film, but (producer Cornelia) Principe says both parties have since reached “a mutually satisfactory settlement of our dispute and have agreed not to comment further.” She says her production company, Raja Pictures, has reclaimed the film’s rights. The film is available to rent worldwide at russiansatwar.com, except in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus, where producers plan to offer it for free at a later date ..." Take care, and enjoy the rest of the week! Source: https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca/entertainment/russians-at-war-team-on-shocking-backlash-to-film-and-direct-to-audience-release/article_29371f45-28e0-594a-93dd-33baa9c27d7f.html (also archived here https://web.archive.org/web/20250814194038/https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca/entertainment/russians-at-war-team-on-shocking-backlash-to-film-and-direct-to-audience-release/article_29371f45-28e0-594a-93dd-33baa9c27d7f.html ) MilNwsCurator (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On August 12, 2025, this film was released globally, except in Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine, on pay-per-view VOD via the film's official website and the Gathr platform. https://www.russiansatwar.com/ https://gathr.com/vod/d4c21224/russians-at-war https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca/entertainment/russians-at-war-team-on-shocking-backlash-to-film-and-direct-to-audience-release/article_29371f45-28e0-594a-93dd-33baa9c27d7f.html NotFiction (talk) 16:39, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is requested that the following edits be made to the article to comply with WP:NPOV, providing a balanced representation of the professional and critical reception of the film.

Please change the current text:

"Deutsche Welle and others noted that the film is controversial.[45] The producers say the film is anti-war. Critics criticize it for empathizing with invading Russian soldiers without judgment and for not informing the viewer on the Russian war crimes.[15]"

To the following text:

"Deutsche Welle and others noted that the film is controversial.[45] The producers describe the film as anti-war, while critics and filmmakers have argued it humanizes the aggressors without addressing their crimes. Documentary filmmaker Vitaly Mansky compared the film's methodology to that of Leni Riefenstahl, stating that the subjects "continue to fight and kill Ukrainians" despite their superficial existential questions.Source1 Film critic Anton Dolin noted that the narrative framing — such as a soldier acting as Santa Claus or providing aid to pro-Russian villagers — resembles "propaganda posters" even if factual, as it omits the broader context of the occupation.Source2" In an interview with Baikal Journal, Trofimova admitted that the film's sampling of civilian perspectives was 'not ideal,' as pro-Ukrainian residents either refused to speak with her or had already left the area.^[1]"

Please change the current text:

"In an unexpected turn of events, Trofimova managed to follow a Russian soldier, whom she had met in a Moscow subway, on his way to the frontline. Taking advantage of a lax approach of local commanders, she eventually embedded herself with a Russian battalion..."

To the following text:

"Trofimova stated that she joined the Russian unit by chance after meeting a soldier in the Moscow subway, taking advantage of the lax approach of local commanders.[10] However, this account has been questioned by professional observers. Vitaly Mansky noted the impossibility of independent filming on the Russian side, stating: 'In Russia, [independent cameramen] are immediately arrested. And here, a person passes checkpoints, films for seven months, is given a military uniform and provided with rations.'[Source1] Furthermore, military analysts cited by DOXA and Meduza explained that long-term access for civilian filmmakers is typically restricted to 'verified' (proverennymi) individuals with a background in state media.Source3"

Please add the following paragraph after the mention of the Canada Media Fund:

"The director's professional background has been a subject of scrutiny. According to independent outlet DOXA, Trofimova has a long-standing history with the state-controlled network RT, having directed multiple documentaries for the channel. Additionally, the Myrotvorets database (cited by DOXA) indicates that Trofimova was accredited as an RT correspondent in the occupied 'DPR' from December 2014 to January 2015.Source3"

~2026-19065-6 (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before creating an edit request. Day Creature (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]