This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Museums Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Dorset Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yl3evm8y8o

©Geni (talk) 04:35, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Roxy the dog -- are we really going to waste time over this? I feel as though you're being unnecessarily strict in regards to this article because of its history. I am adding sourced content, there is no reason for you to be removing it. The collaboration with Lush was well reported on, because Lush is from the same city as this museum apparently. By what metric do you decide what is trivia and what isn't? MediaKyle (talk) 23:17, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to waste my time, no. Why are you spamming this nonsense? Just because you can source it, doesn't make it due for the article. Did you add the equally trivial pointless rock to the article too? You'll be re-adding all the BCPC Marketeering Spam next. Please stop and think about it a little. - Walter Ego 07:57, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping that I could update this article, so that folks wouldn't feel the need to spam it. I see now you're going to make this difficult for me, so I will leave you to keep gatekeeping. MediaKyle (talk) 11:38, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What were you going to update with? I suppose if you were already spamming folks wouldn't feel the need, sure, but the question is why do you feel the need to Pam this nonsense. Does it bring the original festering stench of the Poole Harbour where the logboat was found to customers bathrooms? Now that would be a notable event in the life of the updated Poole Museum !!!! Gatekeeping - nah - but I do have 10k plus articles on my watchlist, of which this is only one. Walter Ego 12:15, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]